Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26338497›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2015

The genomics of microbial domestication in the fermented food environment.

John G Gibbons, David C Rinker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Genetic and technological diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Transcriptomics ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John G GibbonsBiology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA, USA. Electronic address: jgibbons@clarku.edu.
David C RinkerCenter for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Chemosensory Signatures of Hematophagy in MosquitoesF31DC012991 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RINKER, DAVID · 2013 to 2015
$82k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC012991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortly after the agricultural revolution, the domestication of bacteria, yeasts, and molds, played an essential role in enhancing the stability, quality, flavor, and texture of food products. These domestication events were probably the result of human food production practices that entailed the continual recycling of isolated microbial communities in the presence of abundant agricultural food sources. We suggest that within these novel agrarian food niches the metabolic requirements of those microbes became regular and predictable resulting in rapid genomic specialization through such mechanisms as pseudogenization, genome decay, interspecific hybridization, gene duplication, and horizontal gene transfer. The ultimate result was domesticated strains of microorganisms with enhanced fermentative capacities.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyGenomicsBacteriaFermentationFoodGenome, BacterialGenome, FungalHumansYeasts

Identifiers

PMID26338497
PMCPMC4695309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.