Sources of variability of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT quantitative parameters.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Analysis and Characterization of Factors Affecting the Consistency of Tl-201 Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Coronary Angiography Results in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
2. New techniques, distinctive population, unique normal databases.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
   Article
3. Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular quantitative parameters obtained using gated myocardial SPECT: Comparison of three software packages.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Adopting new gamma cameras and reconstruction algorithms: Do we need to re-establish normal reference values?2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as