Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26338341›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Spatiotemporal Coding of Individual Chemicals by the Gustatory System.

Sam Reiter, Chelsey Campillo Rodriguez, Kui Sun, Mark Stopfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The lepidopteran analyst: how caterpillars, moths and butterflies encode taste identity and valence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Survey of temporal coding of sensory information.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Variation in the geneAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fuelling on the wing: sensory ecology of hawkmoth foraging.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Review
  17. EMBO reports · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sam ReiterNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-663X
Chelsey Campillo RodriguezNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and.
Kui SunNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5430-1664
Mark StopferNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and stopferm@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-1884

Funding

Sensory Coding by Ensembles of Neurons.ZIAHD008760 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI STOPFER, MARK A · 2009 to 2025
$26.3M
CRCNS: Multiple roles of inhibition in the olfactory systemR01DC012943 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAZHENOV, MAKSIM V · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four of the five major sensory systems (vision, olfaction, somatosensation, and audition) are thought to use different but partially overlapping sets of neurons to form unique representations of vast numbers of stimuli. The only exception is gustation, which is thought to represent only small numbers of basic taste categories. However, using new methods for delivering tastant chemicals and making electrophysiological recordings from the tractable gustatory system of the moth Manduca sexta, we found chemical-specific information is as follows: (1) initially encoded in the population of gustatory receptor neurons as broadly distributed spatiotemporal patterns of activity; (2) dramatically integrated and temporally transformed as it propagates to monosynaptically connected second-order neurons; and (3) observed in tastant-specific behavior. Our results are consistent with an emerging view of the gustatory system: rather than constructing basic taste categories, it uses a spatiotemporal population code to generate unique neural representations of individual tastant chemicals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our results provide a new view of taste processing. Using a new, relatively simple model system and a new set of techniques to deliver taste stimuli and to examine gustatory receptor neurons and their immediate followers, we found no evidence for labeled line connectivity, or basic taste categories such as sweet, salty, bitter, and sour. Rather, individual tastant chemicals are represented as patterns of spiking activity distributed across populations of receptor neurons. These representations are transformed substantially as multiple types of receptor neurons converge upon follower neurons, leading to a combinatorial coding format that uniquely, rapidly, and efficiently represents individual taste chemicals. Finally, we found that the information content of these neurons can drive tastant-specific behavior.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsChemoreceptor CellsDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectrophysiologyFemaleMaleManducaMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningReaction TimeSense OrgansSodium ChlorideStimulation, ChemicalSucroseSynapsesSodium ChlorideSucroseneural codingtaste

Identifiers

PMID26338341
PMCPMC4556795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.