Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26338219›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance.

Wei-Qi Wei, Pedro L Teixeira, Huan Mo, Robert M Cronin, Jeremy L Warner, Joshua C Denny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Identifying dementia cases with routinely collected health data: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Validating ICD code case definitions for condition case ascertainment in multimorbidity measurement: a retrospective chart review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Declining incidence of Parkinson's disease in Israel (2002-2021).Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei-Qi WeiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pedro L TeixeiraDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Huan MoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert M CroninDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jeremy L WarnerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joshua C DennyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA josh.denny@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Understanding and preventing HLA-associated drug reactionsP50GM115305 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C. · 2015 to 2019
$13.0M
From GWAS to PheWAS: Scanning the EMR Phenome for Gene-disease AssociationsR01LM010685 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASTARACHE, LISA · 2011 to 2022
$6.3M
National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
Vanderbilt Genome Electronic Records ProjectU01HG006378 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2011 to 2014
$4.0M
Informatics Tools for Pharmacogenomic Discovery using Practice-based DataR01GM103859 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
Exploring Statin Pleiotropic Effects within a Very Large EHR Cohort - Diversity SupplementR01HL133786 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WEI, WEI-QI · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006378NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133786NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM115305NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103859NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the phenotyping performance of three major electronic health record (EHR) components: International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis codes, primary notes, and specific medications. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted the evaluation using de-identified Vanderbilt EHR data. We preselected ten diseases: atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, breast cancer, gout, human immunodeficiency virus infection, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. For each disease, patients were classified into seven categories based on the presence of evidence in diagnosis codes, primary notes, and specific medications. Twenty-five patients per disease category (a total number of 175 patients for each disease, 1750 patients for all ten diseases) were randomly selected for manual chart review. Review results were used to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, andF-score for each EHR component alone and in combination.

resultsThe PPVs of single components were inconsistent and inadequate for accurately phenotyping (0.06-0.71). Using two or more ICD codes improved the average PPV to 0.84. We observed a more stable and higher accuracy when using at least two components (mean ± standard deviation: 0.91 ± 0.08). Primary notes offered the best sensitivity (0.77). The sensitivity of ICD codes was 0.67. Again, two or more components provided a reasonably high and stable sensitivity (0.59 ± 0.16). Overall, the best performance (Fscore: 0.70 ± 0.12) was achieved by using two or more components. Although the overall performance of using ICD codes (0.67 ± 0.14) was only slightly lower than using two or more components, its PPV (0.71 ± 0.13) is substantially worse (0.91 ± 0.08).

conclusionMultiple EHR components provide a more consistent and higher performance than a single one for the selected phenotypes. We suggest considering multiple EHR components for future phenotyping design in order to obtain an ideal result.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsInternational Classification of DiseasesPhenotypeDiagnosisHumansMedical Records, Problem-OrientedPredictive Value of Testsclinical notesdiagnosis codeselectronic health recordsInternational Classification of Diseasesmedicationsphenotypeproblem lists

Identifiers

PMID26338219
PMCPMC4954637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.