ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016
Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
147 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Case Definitions and Data Sources for NNCSS Parkinson Disease Surveillance: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of Diagnostic Codes and Algorithms Used to Identify Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Administrative Claims and Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Pooled it
- Penetrance and Pleiotropy of Polygenic Risk Scores for Schizophrenia in 106,160 Patients Across Four Health Care Systems.The American journal of psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Identifying Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism cases using routinely collected healthcare data: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Identifying dementia cases with routinely collected health data: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2018Pooled it
- Temporal windowing of recurrent sinusitis improves EHR-based immunodeficiency classification.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Beyond Pain Intensity: A Patient-Informed Framework for Documenting Burden in Small Fiber Neuropathy.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- TriNetX LATAM Collaborative Network, an EHR Data Source in Latin America.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Towards scalable biomarker discovery in posttraumatic stress disorder: triangulating genomic and phenotypic evidence from a health system biobank.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Validating ICD code case definitions for condition case ascertainment in multimorbidity measurement: a retrospective chart review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Natural language processing to enhance rheumatoid arthritis care in clinical studies: a scoping review of applications, data, approaches, challenges and future directions.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk factors for comorbid diagnoses in individuals with substance use disorders: A phenome-wide survival analysis.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Parkinson's disease in real life healthcare organization database: a medication-based algorithm.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Genomics of drug target prioritization for complex diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Evaluating the impact of family history and polygenic risk scores on cardiometabolic disease risk.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Use of Clinical Notes to Assess Neuropsychiatric Events After Montelukast Initiation.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Declining incidence of Parkinson's disease in Israel (2002-2021).Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Large-scale automated phenotyping of cardiac arrest and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy using electronic health record data.Resuscitation · 2026Article
- Imminent opioid overdose risk prediction using classical and machine learning survival models following first recorded opioid-related diagnosis: a prospective cohort study from theThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2026Article
- Longitudinal analysis of electronic health records reveals medical conditions associated with subsequent Alzheimer's disease development.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the phenotyping performance of three major electronic health record (EHR) components: International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis codes, primary notes, and specific medications. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted the evaluation using de-identified Vanderbilt EHR data. We preselected ten diseases: atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, breast cancer, gout, human immunodeficiency virus infection, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. For each disease, patients were classified into seven categories based on the presence of evidence in diagnosis codes, primary notes, and specific medications. Twenty-five patients per disease category (a total number of 175 patients for each disease, 1750 patients for all ten diseases) were randomly selected for manual chart review. Review results were used to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, andF-score for each EHR component alone and in combination.
resultsThe PPVs of single components were inconsistent and inadequate for accurately phenotyping (0.06-0.71). Using two or more ICD codes improved the average PPV to 0.84. We observed a more stable and higher accuracy when using at least two components (mean ± standard deviation: 0.91 ± 0.08). Primary notes offered the best sensitivity (0.77). The sensitivity of ICD codes was 0.67. Again, two or more components provided a reasonably high and stable sensitivity (0.59 ± 0.16). Overall, the best performance (Fscore: 0.70 ± 0.12) was achieved by using two or more components. Although the overall performance of using ICD codes (0.67 ± 0.14) was only slightly lower than using two or more components, its PPV (0.71 ± 0.13) is substantially worse (0.91 ± 0.08).
conclusionMultiple EHR components provide a more consistent and higher performance than a single one for the selected phenotypes. We suggest considering multiple EHR components for future phenotyping design in order to obtain an ideal result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.