Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26338199›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2015

Carbon ion beam combined with cisplatin effectively disrupts triple negative breast cancer stem-like cells in vitro.

Sei Sai, Guillaume Vares, Eun Ho Kim, Kumiko Karasawa, Bing Wang, Mitsuru Nenoi, Yoshiya Horimoto, Mitsuhiro Hayashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Value of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Basic and translational research on carbon-ion radiobiology.American journal of cancer research · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Carbon ion radiation therapy in breast cancer: a new frontier.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sei SaiMedical Physics Research Program, Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan. saisei@nirs.go.jp.
Guillaume VaresRadiation Risk Reduction Research Program, Research Center for Radiation Protection, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Eun Ho KimDivision of Heavy Ion Clinical Research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 215-4 Gongneung-dong, Nowon-Gu, Seoul, 139-706, South Korea.
Kumiko KarasawaResearch Center Hospital for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Bing WangRadiation Risk Reduction Research Program, Research Center for Radiation Protection, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Mitsuru NenoiRadiation Risk Reduction Research Program, Research Center for Radiation Protection, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshiya HorimotoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuhiro HayashiDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough a relatively small proportion of all breast cancer (BC), triple negative (TN) BC is responsible for a relatively large proportion of BC deaths because of its worse clinical outcome. To investigate whether a carbon ion beam alone or in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) has a beneficial effect compared to X-rays, we target triple negative (TN) breast cancer stem-like cells (CSCs).

methodsHuman breast CSCs sorted from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cells were treated with a carbon ion beam or X-ray irradiation alone or in combination with CDDP, and then colony, spheroid and tumor formation assays, RT-PCR Array analysis, and immunofluorescence γH2AX foci assay were performed.

resultsThe colony, spheroid formation, and tumorigenicity assays confirmed that CD44+/CD24- and ESA+/CD24- cells have CSC properties in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cells, respectively. The proportion of CSCs was more enriched after CDDP combination with either X-ray or carbon ion beam, however carbon ion beam combined with CDDP significantly suppressed colony and spheroid formation and more significantly inhibited cell cycle progression (sub-G1 arrest) compared to X-ray combined with CDDP or carbon ion beam alone. RT-PCR Array analysis showed that carbon ion beam combined with CDDP significantly induced apoptosis-related Cytochrome c, almost completely eliminated expression of the CSC markers CD44 and ESA, and significantly inhibited angiogenesis, and metastasis-related HIF1α and CD26 compared to carbon ion beam alone, X-ray alone, or X-ray combined with CDDP. The immunofluorescence assay showed that not only the number but also the size of γH2AX foci in CSCs were larger 24 h after carbon ion beam combined with CDDP compared to those of X-ray alone and X-ray combined with CDDP.

conclusionsCarbon ion beam combined with CDDP has superior potential to kill TN breast CSCs with irreparable severe DNA damage and enhanced apoptosis.

Indexed as

Heavy Ion RadiotherapyApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDNA DamageFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplastic Stem CellsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsX-RaysCisplatinNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26338199
PMCPMC4560051
OpenAlexW2098663173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.