Trial reportEye (London, England)2015
High-dose ranibizumab monotherapy for neovascular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in a predominantly non-Asian population.
Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined Therapy Versus Fortified Anti-VEGF Monotherapy in Type C Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Biomarker Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Combined Use of Anti-VEGF Drugs Before and During Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Short-Term Efficacy in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Patients Treated With Intravitreal Aflibercept or Conbercept.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- The Efficacy of Conbercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: Pearls in diagnosis and management.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Review
- Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: An update on current management and review of literature.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine safety and efficacy of intravitreal high-dose ranibizumab in the treatment of active neovascular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).
methodsIn this Phase I/II, single-center, randomized, controlled, double-masked study, predominantly non-Asian, previously treated or treatment-naive, male and female adult patients were randomized to receive high-dose (1.0/0.1 ml or 2.0 mg/0.05 ml; n=15) or standard-dose (0.5 mg/0.05 ml; n=5) ranibizumab in 3 monthly loading doses, followed by 9 months of criteria-based, as-needed retreatment. Safety was evaluated by a descriptive analysis of all non-serious and serious adverse events, angiographic assessments, physical examinations, vital signs, ocular examinations, and visual acuity measurements. Visual acuity and anatomic outcomes are described for the high-dose group.
resultsTwenty patients (aged 35-76 years; 8 Black, 11 White, 1 Asian) were enrolled. At baseline, in the high-dose group, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 63.5 letters (Snellen equivalent ~20/50), and mean baseline central foveal thickness (CFT) was 253.7 μm. High-dose ranibizumab was generally well tolerated without evidence of ocular or systemic severe adverse events, including arterial thromboembolic events. At month 12, in the high-dose group, the mean overall change from baseline in BCVA was +6.7 letters and in CFT was -49.7 μm.
conclusionHigh-dose ranibizumab monotherapy is safe and efficacious for treating patients with PCV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.