Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26337789›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2016

Transcriptomic Analysis of Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cells as a Validation for Their Use in Cell Replacement Therapy.

Ricardo F Frausto, Derek J Le, Anthony J Aldave

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Genes to Disease: ReassessingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Looking into the Eyes-In Vitro Models for Ocular Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Altered gene expression in slc4a11Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proliferation of Human Corneal Endothelia in Organ Culture Stimulated by Wounding and the Engineered Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 Derivative TTHX1114.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo F FraustoThe Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Derek J Le
Anthony J Aldave
Doheny Eye Institute · US

Funding

Vision Research Core at UCLAP30EY000331 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Xian-Jie Yang · 1985 to 2026
$16.8M
Identification and Characterization of the Genetic Basis of PPCDR01EY022082 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALDAVE, ANTHONY JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY000331NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corneal endothelium plays a primary role in maintaining corneal homeostasis and clarity and must be surgically replaced with allogenic donor corneal endothelium in the event of visually significant dysfunction. However, a worldwide shortage of donor corneal tissue has led to a search for alternative sources of transplantable tissue. Cultured human corneal endothelial cells (HCEnC) have been shown to restore corneal clarity in experimental models of corneal endothelial dysfunction in animal models, but characterization of cultured HCEnC remains incomplete. To this end, we utilized next-generation RNA sequencing technology to compare the transcriptomic profile of ex vivo human corneal endothelial cells (evHCEnC) with that of primary HCEnC (pHCEnC) and HCEnC lines and to determine the utility of cultured and immortalized corneal endothelial cells as models of in vivo corneal endothelium. Multidimensional analyses of the transcriptome data sets demonstrated that primary HCEnC have a closer relationship to evHCEnC than do immortalized HCEnC. Subsequent analyses showed that the majority of the genes specifically expressed in HCEnC (not expressed in ex vivo corneal epithelium or fibroblasts) demonstrated a marked variability of expression in cultured cells compared with evHCEnC. In addition, genes associated with either corneal endothelial cell function or corneal endothelial dystrophies were investigated. Significant differences in gene expression and protein levels were observed in the cultured cells compared with evHCEnC for each of the genes tested except for AGBL1 and LOXHD1, which were not detected by RNA-seq or qPCR. Our transcriptomic analysis suggests that at a molecular level pHCEnC most closely resemble evHCEnC and thus represent the most viable cell culture-based therapeutic option for managing corneal endothelial cell dysfunction. Our findings also suggest that investigators should perform an assessment of the entire transcriptome of cultured HCEnC prior to determination of their potential clinical utility for the management of corneal endothelial cell failure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCells, CulturedCell ShapeChildCluster AnalysisCorneal Dystrophies, HereditaryDatabases, GeneticEndothelial CellsEndothelium, CornealGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMiddle AgedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26337789
PMCPMC4775465
OpenAlexW1267209544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.