Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26337660›Full record

ReviewQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2016

Circulating DNA in solid organ cancers-analysis and clinical application.

E Karampini, F McCaughan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E KarampiniFrom the 1Department of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK and.
F McCaughanFrom the 1 Department of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK and.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0500392Wellcome Trust WT097143MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is that fraction of circulating DNA that is derived from a patient's cancer. For a number of years, patients with haematological malignancies have had their disease diagnosed or monitored using tests based on detecting specific cytological or molecular biomarkers in blood. It has long been appreciated that the more common epithelial malignancies also shed DNA into the blood and that this tumour-derived DNA generally contributes a minor percentage of the overall cell-free DNA burden in peripheral blood. The biotech revolution has transformed our ability to detect, quantify and interpret genetic events. This has led to a renewed interest in the potential of using a simple blood test to both diagnose cancer and longitudinally monitor the response to medical interventions in patients with solid organ malignancies.In this review we provide a summary of the literature to date and describe the main attributes of the current analytical approaches to ctDNA. We then focus on the potential clinical applications. There is increasing evidence to support the routine analysis of ctDNA in clinical decision-making for certain subgroups of patients with so-called hotspot mutations, particularly in lung and colorectal cancer. With continued refinement and technological progress, non-invasive molecular biomarkers including of ctDNA may be clinically useful at all stages of cancer management from diagnosis to disease progression.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDNA, NeoplasmHumansLung NeoplasmsMutationBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID26337660
PMCPMC5916343
OpenAlexW2115997708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.