ReviewGlobalization and health2015
Bibliometric analysis on global Catha edulis (khat) research production during the period of 1952-2014.
Review in Globalization and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends in atherosclerosis: A bibliometric and visualized study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- The Arab region's contribution to global COVID-19 research: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.Globalization and health · 2021Article
- Progress and Research Trends onFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Impact of khat price increases on consumption behavior - price elasticity analysis.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2019Article
- Global research trends in West Nile virus from 1943 to 2016: a bibliometric analysis.Globalization and health · 2017Article
- Global toxocariasis research trends from 1932 to 2015: a bibliometric analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Characterization of the Antinociceptive Mechanisms of Khat Extract (Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- A bibliometric analysis of literature on malaria vector resistance: (1996 - 2015).Globalization and health · 2016Review
- Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Dengue research: a bibliometric analysis of worldwide and Arab publications during 1872-2015.Virology journal · 2016Article
- Worldwide research productivity on tramadol: a bibliometric analysis.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublication of scientific articles related to khat (Catha edulis) in peer-reviewed journals is considered a measure of research productivity. The principal objectives of this study were to quantify the research contribution related to khat at the global level, as well as to determine its relative growth rate, collaborative measures taken, productivity at the institutional level, and the most prolific journals publishing on the topic.
methodsOn the basis of title words related to khat, publications were identified for all data in Scopus bibliographic database's history up to December 31, 2014. The research productivity for the top 10 countries was evaluated in relation to the population size and gross domestic product (GDP) in 2013.
resultsThe criteria were met by 651documents published in 51 countries. The largest number of articles associated with khat was from the UK (15.2 %), followed by Yemen (10.3 %), the USA (9.7 %) and Ethiopia (9.1 %). Ethiopia, Yemen, and Kenya had the highest productivity of publications after standardization by population size and GDP. Furthermore, Yemen achieved the highest number of collaborations, by having researchers from 19 countries. Ethiopia followed, having researchers from 16 countries.
conclusionsThis bibliometric study provides a demonstration for the worldwide research activity regarding khat. The number of articles related to khat has increased rapidly over the last 10 years. The present study is a good starting point to evaluate research activity in the field of khat. Although the data shows a promising increase in the research activity, the quantity of khat-related research is still too little compared to the massive use of khat in certain countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.