Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26337202›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2015

Rural substance use treatment centers in the United States: an assessment of treatment quality by location.

Mary Bond Edmond, Lydia Aletraris, Paul M Roman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary Bond Edmonda Owens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Lydia Aletraris
Paul M Roman

Funding

ADOPTION OF INNOVATIONS IN PRIVATE A&D TREATMENT CENTERSR01DA013110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 1999 to 2010
$4.9M
Use of Evidence-based Practices in Alcoholism TreatmentR01AA015974 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015974NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile previous research has added to the understanding of rural residents' unique health challenges, much remains to be learned about the provision of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in rural areas. A key question is difference in structural resources and quality of care between rural and urban treatment centers.

objectiveTo examine differences in treatment quality in rural and urban centers and to determine if differences in treatment quality are contextualized by centers' structural resources.

methodsUtilizing combined data from two representative samples of SUD treatment centers (n = 591), we used a series of multivariate regressions to analyze the association between center rurality and various indicators of structural characteristics and treatment quality. Interaction effects were further examined between structural characteristics and treatment quality indicators.

resultsWe found that structural and quality differences between rural and urban treatment centers were present. Rural centers had reduced access to highly educated counselors, were more likely to be non-profit and dependent on public funding, offered fewer wraparound services, and had less diverse specialized treatment options. Our results also indicated that rural centers were less likely to prescribe buprenorphine as part of their treatment but were more likely to employ nursing staff and offer specialized treatment for adolescents. Rural center access to a physician contextualized the association between center rurality and the more limited provision of wraparound services.

conclusionOur findings suggest that treatment quality differs between urban and rural centers in complex ways that are subject to resource availability.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareHumansRural Health ServicesSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersUnited StatesUrban Health ServicesAddictionruralsubstance use disordertreatment qualityurban

Identifiers

PMID26337202
PMCPMC4775429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.