Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26337177›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2016

Inferring gene duplications, transfers and losses can be done in a discrete framework.

Vincent Ranwez, Celine Scornavacca, Jean-Philippe Doyon, Vincent Berry

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent RanwezSupAgro, UMR-AGAP, 2 Place Pierre Viala, 34060, Montpellier, France.
Celine ScornavaccaISEM, UMR 5554 (Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE), Place Eugene Bataillon, Montpellier, France. celine.scornavacca@univ-montp2.fr.
Jean-Philippe DoyonISEM, UMR 5554 (Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE), Place Eugene Bataillon, Montpellier, France.
Vincent BerryLIRMM, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
École Pratique des Hautes Études · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRInstitut Montpelliérain Alexander Grothendieck · FRLaboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of phylogenetics, the evolutionary history of a set of organisms is commonly depicted by a species tree-whose internal nodes represent speciation events-while the evolutionary history of a gene family is depicted by a gene tree-whose internal nodes can also represent macro-evolutionary events such as gene duplications and transfers. As speciation events are only part of the events shaping a gene history, the topology of a gene tree can show incongruences with that of the corresponding species tree. These incongruences can be used to infer the macro-evolutionary events undergone by the gene family. This is done by embedding the gene tree inside the species tree and hence providing a reconciliation of those trees. In the past decade, several parsimony-based methods have been developed to infer such reconciliations, accounting for gene duplications ([Formula: see text]), transfers ([Formula: see text]) and losses ([Formula: see text]). The main contribution of this paper is to formally prove an important assumption implicitly made by previous works on these reconciliations, namely that solving the (maximum) parsimony [Formula: see text] reconciliation problem in the discrete framework is equivalent to finding a most parsimonious [Formula: see text] scenario in the continuous framework. In the process, we also prove several intermediate results that are useful on their own and constitute a theoretical toolbox that will likely facilitate future theoretical contributions in the field.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsEvolution, MolecularGene DeletionGenetic SpeciationGene Transfer, HorizontalPhylogenyEquivalenceGene evolutionParsimonyPhylogeneticsTree embeddingTree reconciliation

Identifiers

PMID26337177
OpenAlexW1511486805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.