Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26336984›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2015

Regulation of BDNF chromatin status and promoter accessibility in a neural correlate of associative learning.

Ganesh Ambigapathy, Zhaoqing Zheng, Joyce Keifer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Role of DNMTs in the Brain.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ganesh Ambigapathya Neuroscience Group; Basic Biomedical Sciences; University of South Dakota; Sanford School of Medicine ; Vermillion , SD USA.
Zhaoqing Zhenga Neuroscience Group; Basic Biomedical Sciences; University of South Dakota; Sanford School of Medicine ; Vermillion , SD USA.
Joyce Keifera Neuroscience Group; Basic Biomedical Sciences; University of South Dakota; Sanford School of Medicine ; Vermillion , SD USA.
Sanford Health · USUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

NEURONAL PATHWAYS UNDERLYING IN VITRO MOTOR LEARNINGR01NS051187 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI KEIFER, JOYCE · 2005 to 2013
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS NS051187NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene expression critically controls learning and its aberrant regulation is implicated in Alzheimer's disease and a host of neurodevelopmental disorders. The BDNF gene is target of known DNA regulatory mechanisms but details of its activity-dependent regulation are not fully characterized. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the epigenetic regulation of the turtle BDNF gene (tBDNF) during a neural correlate of associative learning using an in vitro model of eye blink classical conditioning. Shortly after conditioning onset, the results from ChIP-qPCR show conditioning-dependent increases in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) and repressor basic helix-loop-helix binding protein 2 (BHLHB2) binding to tBDNF promoter II that corresponds with transcriptional repression. In contrast, enhanced binding of ten-eleven translocation protein 1 (Tet1), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) to promoter III corresponds with transcriptional activation. These actions are accompanied by rapid modifications in histone methylation and phosphorylation status of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II). Significantly, these remarkably coordinated changes in epigenetic factors for two alternatively regulated tBDNF promoters during conditioning are controlled by Tet1 and ERK1/2. Our findings indicate that Tet1 and ERK1/2 are critical partners that, through complementary functions, control learning-dependent tBDNF promoter accessibility required for rapid transcription and acquisition of classical conditioning.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3NeuronsPromoter Regions, GeneticTurtlesBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3ChIP assaysclassical conditioningCREBhistonesTet1

Identifiers

PMID26336984
PMCPMC5055205
OpenAlexW2137924078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.