Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26336653›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Georgia Public Health Association2015

Community-based participatory research principles for the African American community.

Selina A Smith, Mary S Whitehead, Joyce Q Sheats, Benjamin E Ansa, Steven S Coughlin, Daniel S Blumenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Process and Cost of Developing a Community Advisory Board Focused on Opioid Overdose Deaths.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Selina A SmithInstitute of Public and Preventive Health, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA.
Mary S WhiteheadSISTAAH Talk Breast Cancer Support Group, Miami, Florida.
Joyce Q SheatsDepartment of Health Science and Sustainability, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts.
Benjamin E AnsaDepartment of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Steven S Coughlin
Daniel S Blumenthal

Funding

Research Desogn and Biostatistics CoreU54MD007588 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MAYBERRY, ROBERT M · 2012 to 2018
$24.8M
Research Training & Career Development ProgramU54CA118638 · NCI · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Brian M. Rivers · 2005 to 2026
$22.7M
Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition of an Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA166785 · NCI · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOBBS, JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166785NCI NIH HHS U54 CA118638NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous sets of principles have been developed to guide the conduct of community-based participatory research (CBPR). However, they tend to be written in language that is most appropriate for academics and other research professionals; they may not help lay people from the community understand CBPR.

methodsMany community members of the National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer assisting with the Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (EPICS) had little understanding of CBPR. We engaged community members in developing culturally-specific principles for conducting academic-community collaborative research.

resultsWe developed a set of CBPR principles intended to resonate with African-American community members.

conclusionsApplying NBLIC-developed CBPR principles contributed to developing and implementing an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

Indexed as

African Americancancercommunity-based participatory researchprinciples

Identifiers

PMID26336653
PMCPMC4554535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.