ArticlePeerJ2015
Interactions between Drosophila and its natural yeast symbionts-Is Saccharomyces cerevisiae a good model for studying the fly-yeast relationship?
Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal fungal communities of millipedes: host species as the dominant driver rather than habitat factors.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Gut yeasts accelerate chill coma recovery in Drosophila melanogaster.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Feeding Drosophila highly radioresistant fungi improves survival and gut morphology following acute gamma radiation exposure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbial metabolites as engines of behavioral variation across animals.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The Gut Microbiota ofMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Structure, function, and quantitative biology of the Drosophila gut microbiome.Current opinion in microbiology · 2025Review
- Wine Fermentation as a Model System for Microbial Ecology and Evolution.Environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Discovery and identification of a novel yeast species,International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025Article
- Live yeasts accelerate Drosophila melanogaster larval development.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- The microbiome analysis of ripen grape berries supports the complex etiology of sour rot.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Salt concentration in substrate modulates the composition of bacterial and yeast microbiomes ofMicrobiome research reports · 2024Article
- Identification of key yeast species and microbe-microbe interactions impacting larval growth ofeLife · 2023Article
- Gut microbial genetic variation modulates host lifespan, sleep, and motor performance.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Basidiomycota species in Drosophila gut are associated with host fat metabolism.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Influence of bacteria on the maintenance of a yeast during Drosophila melanogaster metamorphosis.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Diversity and Functions of Yeast Communities Associated with Insects.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Impact of Background Fruit Odors on Attraction of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to Its Symbiotic Yeast.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2021Article
- Separate and combined Hanseniaspora uvarum and Metschnikowia pulcherrima metabolic volatiles are attractive to Drosophila suzukii in the laboratory and field.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits ofThe Journal of experimental biology · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Yeasts play an important role in the biology of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. In addition to being a valuable source of nutrition, yeasts affect D. melanogaster behavior and interact with the host immune system. Most experiments investigating the role of yeasts in D. melanogaster biology use the baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, S. cerevisiae is rarely found with natural populations of D. melanogaster or other Drosophila species. Moreover, the strain of S. cerevisiae used most often in D. melanogaster experiments is a commercially and industrially important strain that, to the best of our knowledge, was not isolated from flies. Since disrupting natural host-microbe interactions can have profound effects on host biology, the results from D. melanogaster-S. cerevisiae laboratory experiments may not be fully representative of host-microbe interactions in nature. In this study, we explore the D. melanogaster-yeast relationship using five different strains of yeast that were isolated from wild Drosophila populations. Ingested live yeasts have variable persistence in the D. melanogaster gastrointestinal tract. For example, Hanseniaspora occidentalis persists relative to S. cerevisiae, while Brettanomyces naardenensis is removed. Despite these differences in persistence relative to S. cerevisiae, we find that all yeasts decrease in total abundance over time. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are an important component of the D. melanogaster anti-microbial response and can inhibit S. cerevisiae growth in the intestine. To determine if sensitivity to ROS explains the differences in yeast persistence, we measured yeast growth in the presence and absence of hydrogen peroxide. We find that B. naardenesis is completely inhibited by hydrogen peroxide, while H. occidentalis is not, which is consistent with yeast sensitivity to ROS affecting persistence within the D. melanogaster gastrointestinal tract. We also compared the feeding preference of D. melanogaster when given the choice between a naturally associated yeast and S. cerevisiae. We do not find a correlation between preferred yeasts and those that persist in the intestine. Notably, in no instances is S. cerevisiae preferred over the naturally associated strains. Overall, our results show that D. melanogaster-yeast interactions are more complex than might be revealed in experiments that use only S. cerevisiae. We propose that future research utilize other yeasts, and especially those that are naturally associated with Drosophila, to more fully understand the role of yeasts in Drosophila biology. Since the genetic basis of host-microbe interactions is shared across taxa and since many of these genes are initially discovered in D. melanogaster, a more realistic fly-yeast model system will benefit our understanding of host-microbe interactions throughout the animal kingdom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.