Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26336513›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2015

A cryptic balanced translocation (5;17), a puzzle revealed through a critical evaluation of the pedigree and a FISH focused on candidate loci suggested by the phenotype.

A Primerano, E Colao, C Villella, M D Nocera, A Ciambrone, E Luciano, L D'Antona, M F M Vismara, S Loddo, A Novelli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Subtelomeric Rearrangements in Patients with Recurrent Miscarriage.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A PrimeranoUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
E ColaoUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
C VillellaUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
M D NoceraUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
A CiambroneUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
E LucianoUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
L D'AntonaDepartment of "Scienze della Salute", Università UMG di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
M F M VismaraUnit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
S LoddoMendel Laboratory, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
A NovelliGenetics Unit, Bambino Gesu Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
N Perrotti *Department of "Scienze della Salute", Università UMG di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Paola Malatesta *Unit of Medical Gentics, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitario Mater Domini · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a case of a woman with a cryptic balanced translocation between chromosomes 5 and 17, suspected during genetic counseling. The woman had a history of previous fetal losses attributed to lissencephaly and intra uterine growth retardation (IUGR) and a daughter with dysmorphic features and mental retardation, previously attributed to a small deletion 5pter, detected years ago by a first generation CGH-array. This peculiar combination of personal and family history suggested the opportunity to carry out a FISH approach, focusing on chromosomes 5 and 17, based on the idea that a malsegregation secondary to a balanced translocation, might have escaped the first CGH array. This approach allowed the identification of a balanced translocation in the mother, FISH in the affected child confirmed the partial 5p deletion predicted by the previous CGH array and identified a new 17p duplication that had not been detected before. The described translocation opens the possibility of alternative imbalances that were probably responsible for previous fetal losses. The imbalances were confirmed by a new high resolution SNP array. We conclude that despite the availability of highly effective and sensitive genomic approaches a careful evaluation of medical history is highly recommended since it can suggest clinical hypothesis that can be confirmed by more classical and molecular cytogenetic based approaches.

Identifiers

PMID26336513
PMCPMC4557763
OpenAlexW1775342150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.