Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26336346›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2015

Neuromuscular Activity of Upper and Lower Limbs during two Backstroke Swimming Start Variants.

Karla De Jesus, Kelly De Jesus, Alexandre I A Medeiros, Pedro Gonçalves, Pedro Figueiredo, Ricardo J Fernandes, João Paulo Vilas-Boas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karla De JesusCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal.
Kelly De JesusCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal.
Alexandre I A MedeirosCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal ; Department of Physical Education, University of Fortaleza , Brazil.
Pedro GonçalvesCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal.
Pedro FigueiredoCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal ; School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul , Brazil.
Ricardo J FernandesCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal ; Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto , Portugal.
João Paulo Vilas-BoasCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto , Portugal ; Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto , Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A proficient start is decisive in sprint competitive swimming events and requires swimmers' to exert maximal forces in a short period to complete the task successfully. The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity in-between the backstroke start with feet positioned parallel and partially emerged performed with the hands on the highest horizontal and on the vertical handgrip at hands-off, take-off, flight and entry start phases. EMG comparisons between starting variants were supported by upper and lower limb joint angles at starting position and 15 m start time data. Following a four-week start training to familiarize participants with each start variant, 10 male competitive backstroke swimmers performed randomly six 15 m maximal trials, being three of each start variant. Surface EMG of Biceps Brachii, Triceps Brachii, Rectus Femoris, Biceps Femoris, Gastrocnemius Medialis and Tibialis Anterior was recorded and processed using the time integral EMG (iEMG). Eight video cameras (four surface and four underwater) were used to determine backstroke start phases and joint angles at starting position. EMG, joint angles and temporal parameters have not evidenced changes due to the different handgrips. Nevertheless, clear differences were observed in both variants for upper and lower limb muscles activity among starting phases (e.g. Biceps Brachii at take-off vs. flight phase, 15.17% ± 2.76% and 22.38% ± 4.25%; 14.24% ± 7.11% and 25.90% ± 8.65%, for variant with hands horizontal and vertically positioned, respectively). It was concluded that different handgrips did not affect EMG, kinematics and temporal profile in backstroke start. Despite coaches might plan similar strength training for both start variants, further attention should be given on the selection of proper exercises to maximize the contribution of relevant muscles at different starting phases. Key pointsAn effective swim start component (from the starting signal until the swimmers' vertex reaches the 15 m mark) is decisive in short distance events.In 2008, FINA approved the Omega OSB11 starting block (Swiss Timing Ltd., Switzerland) with two horizontal and one vertical backstroke start handgrip and currently swimmers can adopt different starting variants.The start performance is related to the exertion of maximal force in the shortest time, as other high-velocity movements; thus, the study of the current variants in-between them from a neuromuscular standpoint is indispensable for training support.The use of different handgrips did not affect upper and lower limb electromyographic activity; angular kinematics and overall 15 m backstroke start profile.Independent of the start variant selected, the role played by each upper and lower limb muscles at different starting phases should be considered in specific resistance training program to optimize backstroke start performance.

Indexed as

backstroke eventsBiomechanicsstarting techniquesurface electromyography

Identifiers

PMID26336346
PMCPMC4541124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.