Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26336344›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2015

Adolescent Self-Reported Physical Activity and Autonomy: A Case for Constrained and Structured Environments?

Jerome N Rachele, Timo Jaakkola, Tracy L Washington, Thomas F Cuddihy, Steven M McPhail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jerome N RacheleSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.
Timo JaakkolaSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.
Tracy L WashingtonSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.
Thomas F CuddihySchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.
Steven M McPhailSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of autonomy supportive environments that promote physical activity engagement have become popular in contemporary youth settings. However, questions remain about whether adolescent perceptions of their autonomy have implications for physical activity. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the association between adolescents' self-reported physical activity and their perceived autonomy. Participants (n = 384 adolescents) aged between 12 and 15 years were recruited from six secondary schools in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia. Self-reported measures of physical activity and autonomy were obtained. Logistic regression with inverse probability weights were used to examine the association between autonomy and the odds of meeting youth physical activity guidelines. Autonomy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76) and gender (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) were negatively associated with meeting physical activity guidelines. However, the model explained only a small amount of the variation in whether youth in this sample met physical activity guidelines (R(2) = 0.023). For every 1 unit decrease in autonomy (on an index from 1 to 5), participants were 1.64 times more likely to meet physical activity guidelines. The findings, which are at odds with several previous studies, suggest that interventions designed to facilitate youth physical activity should limit opportunities for youth to make independent decisions about their engagement. However, the small amount of variation explained by the predictors in the model is a caveat, and should be considered prior to applying such suggestions in practical settings. Future research should continue to examine a larger age range, longitudinal observational or intervention studies to examine assertions of causality, as well as objective measurement of physical activity. Key pointsAutonomy was negatively associated with meeting physical activity recommendationsThe findings suggest that more structured environments would facilitate physical activityThe small amount of variation explained by the predictors in the model is a caveat.

Indexed as

Adolescentautonomyphysical activityself-determination theoryself-report

Identifiers

PMID26336344
PMCPMC4541121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.