Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26336178›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Affinity for natal environments by dispersers impacts reproduction and explains geographical structure of a highly mobile bird.

Robert J Fletcher, Ellen P Robertson, Rebecca C Wilcox, Brian E Reichert, James D Austin, Wiley M Kitchens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolating the roles of movement and reproduction on effective connectivity alters conservation priorities for an endangered bird.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert J FletcherDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA robert.fletcher@ufl.edu.
Ellen P RobertsonDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Rebecca C WilcoxDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Brian E ReichertDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
James D AustinDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Wiley M KitchensDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding dispersal and habitat selection behaviours is central to many problems in ecology, evolution and conservation. One factor often hypothesized to influence habitat selection by dispersers is the natal environment experienced by juveniles. Nonetheless, evidence for the effect of natal environment on dispersing, wild vertebrates remains limited. Using 18 years of nesting and mark-resight data across an entire North American geographical range of an endangered bird, the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis), we tested for natal effects on breeding-site selection by dispersers and its consequences for reproductive success and population structure. Dispersing snail kites were more likely to nest in wetlands of the same habitat type (lacustrine or palustrine) as their natal wetland, independent of dispersal distance, but this preference declined with age and if individuals were born during droughts. Importantly, dispersing kites that bred in natal-like habitats had lower nest success and productivity than kites that did not. These behaviours help explain recently described population connectivity and spatial structure across their geographical range and reveal that assortative breeding is occurring, where birds are more likely to breed with individuals born in the same wetland type as their natal habitat. Natal environments can thus have long-term and large-scale effects on populations in nature, even in highly mobile animals.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionEcosystemNesting BehaviorAcclimatizationAge FactorsAnimalsFalconiformesFloridaGeographyReproductionWetlandsconnectivitydispersalevolutionary trapnatal habitat preference inductionsnail kitespatial network

Identifiers

PMID26336178
PMCPMC4571708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.