Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335921›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Associations of Bone Mineral Density with Lean Mass, Fat Mass, and Dietary Patterns in Postmenopausal Chinese Women: A 2-Year Prospective Study.

Yongjie Chen, Jing Xiang, Zhiqiang Wang, Yaming Xiao, Dongmei Zhang, Xia Chen, Huiting Li, Meina Liu, Qiuju Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yongjie ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Jing XiangDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Zhiqiang WangSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Yaming XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Dongmei ZhangThe First People's Hospital of Tengzhou, Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, China.
Xia ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine, Public Health College, Changsha Medical University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China.
Huiting LiThe Harbin Institute of Technology Hospital, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Meina LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Qiuju ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess factors associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women in a longitudinal study, and to examine the relative contribution of lean mass, fat mass, dietary patterns, and years since menopause to BMD.

methodsTwo hundred and eighty-two postmenopausal women were randomly selected from Hongqi Community Health Center, in Harbin City, China. All participants were followed up from 2009 to 2011. Dietary data were collected using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. BMD of the left hip, the lumbar spine, and the total body, and the body composition were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and follow-up.

resultsLean mass and fat mass were positively associated with BMD of the spine, hip, and the total body at both baseline and follow-up. The association between fat mass and BMD at the spine at baseline (P = 0.210) and at the spine (P = 0.116) and hip (P = 0.073) in the second year was not statistically significant when height was adjusted. Six dietary patterns were identified but only cereal grains-fruits pattern (P = 0.001 in the spine, P = 0.037 in hip) and milk-root vegetables pattern (P = 0.010 in hip) were associated with BMD of the spine and hip. The linear mixed model of follow-up data showed that lean mass, years since menopause, and age of menophania were the significant determinants of BMD of all sites. Moreover, lean mass was the best determinant of BMD (VIP = 1.936).

conclusionLean mass, years since menopause, age of menophania and dietary patterns are the important determinants of BMD of the spine, hip, and the total body. Lean mass is the best determinant of BMD.

Indexed as

Body CompositionBone DensityDietFeeding BehaviorPostmenopauseAdiposityAgedAsian PeopleBody Mass IndexChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26335921
PMCPMC4559415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.