Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335608›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2015

Upfront FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab followed by fluoropyrimidin and bevacizumab maintenance in patients with molecularly unselected metastatic colorectal cancer.

Alexander Stein, Djordje Atanackovic, Bert Hildebrandt, Patrick Stübs, Wolfram Brugger, Gunnar Hapke, Claus-Christoph Steffens, Gerald Illerhaus, Ernst Bluemner, Jan Stöhlmacher and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander SteinUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Djordje AtanackovicUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Bert HildebrandtCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany.
Patrick StübsUniversity Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Wolfram BruggerSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Klinikstrasse 11, Villingen-Schwenningen 78052, Germany.
Gunnar HapkeMarienkrankenhaus, Alfredstrasse 9, Hamburg 22087, Germany.
Claus-Christoph SteffensMVZ Hämatologie/Onkologie Klinik Dr Hancken, Harsefelder Str. 8, Stade 21680, Germany.
Gerald IllerhausKlinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, Stuttgart 70174, Germany.
Ernst BluemnerEcron Acunova GmbH, Hahnstrasse 70, Frankfurt 60528, Germany.
Jan StöhlmacherTumorgenetik Bonn, Maximilianstrasse 28d, Bonn 53111, Germany.
Carsten BokemeyerUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DEMarienkrankenhaus Hamburg · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DESchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe addition of bevacizumab (BEV) to standard doublet chemotherapy improves outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The OPAL study examined the effect of BEV+FOLFOXIRI followed by 5FU/LV and BEV maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated unresectable mCRC.

methodsEligible patients had histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG performance status ⩽1 and were 18-70 years old. Patients received up to 12 cycles of FOLFOXIRI+BEV q2w (induction phase) followed by up to ⩽40 cycles of 5FU/LV+BEV q2w (maintenance phase). Median PFS was the primary end point; secondary end points included response, OS, secondary resection rate, safety and prognostic value of pharmacogenetic profiling.

resultsNinety-seven patients were enrolled. Of these, 90 received study medication and formed the safety population: 64 males; median age 58 (range 28-71) years; ECOG performance status 0/1 in 54%/46% patients; and liver only disease in 35 patients. Relative dose intensities were 79-85% for all four drugs. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was as previously reported and there were no new safety signals. In total, 87 serious AEs occurred in 39 patients (43%). Median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.4-12.0) and did thus not meet the primary objective of 12 months. Median OS was 32.2 months (95% CI 22.6-36.9). Fifty-two patients were pharmacogenetically profiled.

conclusionsFOLFOXIRI+BEV was feasible in this molecularly unselected mCRC patient population, showing a high efficacy in terms of survival, overall response and secondary resection rate. Pharmacogenomic profiling revealed no clinically relevant marker.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCamptothecinColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluorouracilGenes, rasHumansInduction ChemotherapyIrinotecanLeucovorinAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabCamptothecinFluorouracilIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID26335608
PMCPMC4578090
OpenAlexW2219540361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.