Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335539›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2016

Femoral shaft fractures in young children (<5 years of age): operative and non-operative treatments in clinical practice.

M Rapp, M M Kaiser, F Grauel, C Gielok, P Illing

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in the Management of Femur Fractures in Young Children.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ESIN in femur fractures in children under 3: is it safe?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Diaphyseal and metaphyseal femoral fractures in childhood].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  12. Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M RappDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Hospital of Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Germany. Marion.Rapp@gmx.de.
M M KaiserDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
F GrauelDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Charité Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
C GielokDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Haunersches Children's Hospital, Lindwurmstrasse 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
P IllingDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Hospital of Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125, Kassel, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinikum Kassel · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemoral shaft fractures comprise around 4 % of all long-bone fractures in childhood. There is controversy about the treatment of fractures in children below 5 years, between those preferring non-operative methods, such as casting or traction, and those supporting elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN).

methodsThis retrospective study evaluates the day-by-day treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children aged 6-60 months in four major paediatric surgery trauma centres in Germany from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2011 by chart review. We analysed all patient-related data, causes of fracture, fracture type, treatment method and potential post-treatment complications.

resultsWe identified 225 patients (male to female 2:1) with femoral shaft fractures. Around 2/3 of these resulted from falls of less than 1 m or 1-3 m, the most frequent result (>40 %) being a long spiral fracture. All 19 children below 1 year of age were treated by casting or traction. Between the ages of 12 and 24 months (n = 56), different treatment concepts were preferred (1/5 ESIN, 2/5 traction and 2/5 spica casting). Between 24 and 36 months, operative and non-operative therapies were equally distributed. In children older than 36 months (n = 64), most fractures were treated by ESIN: six children by external fixation and 14 by other treatments like spica casting, plate osteosynthesis or a combination of methods. 42 changes of treatment were performed: traction to spica casting or secondary operative treatment and 21 complications occurred (nails left in place for too long, skin defects or wound infections).

conclusionsSpica casting of femoral shaft fractures or, in some cases, traction is still the preferred treatment in the first and second years of life. In the third year, children are treated operatively as well as non-operatively, although now there is no current evidence of better short-term outcomes in operatively treated children. But elastic stable intramedullary nailing is the standard treatment for femoral shaft fractures in children older than 3 years of age.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolFemaleFemoral FracturesFracture FixationGermanyHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChildrenElastic stable intramedullary nailingFemoral fractureSpica castingTraction

Identifiers

PMID26335539
OpenAlexW1250148507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.