Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335475›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2015

West Nile Virus Activity in a Winter Roost of American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos): Is Bird-To-Bird Transmission Important in Persistence and Amplification?

M G Hinton, W K Reisen, S S Wheeler, A K Townsend

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M G HintonDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, & Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, 1088 Academic Surge, Davis, CA 95616. mghinton@ucdavis.edu.
W K ReisenDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, & Immunology, University of California, Davis, Center for Vectorborne Diseases, Old Davis Road, Davis, CA 95616.
S S WheelerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, & Immunology, University of California, Davis, Center for Vectorborne Diseases, Old Davis Road, Davis, CA 95616.
A K TownsendDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, & Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, 1088 Academic Surge, Davis, CA 95616. Department of Biology, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323.
Hamilton College · US

Funding

Persistence of West Nile virus in CaliforniaR01AI055607 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI REISEN, WILLIAM K · 2003 to 2012
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI55607NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its emergence in North America, West Nile virus (WNV) has had a large impact on equines, humans, and wild bird communities, yet gaps remain in our understanding of how the virus persists at temperate latitudes when winter temperatures preclude virus replication and host-seeking activity by mosquito vectors. Bird-to-bird transmission at large communal American Crow roosts could provide one mechanism for WNV persistence. Herein, we describe seasonal patterns of crow and Culex mosquito abundance, WNV infection rates, and the prevalence of WNV-positive fecal samples at a winter crow roost to test the hypothesis that bird-to-bird transmission allows WNV to persist at winter crow roosts. Samples were collected from large winter crow roosts in the Sacramento Valley of California from January 2013 until August 2014, encompassing two overwintering roost periods. West Nile virus RNA was detected in local crow carcasses in both summer [13/18 (72% WNV positive)] and winter [18/44 (41% WNV positive)] 2013-2014. Winter infections were unlikely to have arisen by recent bites from infected mosquitoes because Culex host-seeking activity was very low in winter and all Culex mosquitoes collected during winter months tested negative for WNV. Opportunities existed for fecal-oral transfer at the overwintering roost: most carcasses that tested positive for WNV had detectable viral RNA in both kidney and cloacal swabs, suggesting that infected crows were shedding virus in their feces, and >50% of crows at the roost were stained with feces by mid-winter. Moreover, 2.3% of fecal samples collected in late summer, when mosquitoes were active, tested positive for WNV RNA. Nevertheless, none of the 1,119 feces collected from three roosts over two winters contained detectable WNV RNA. This study provided evidence of WNV infection in overwintering American crows without mosquito vector activity, but did not elucidate a mechanism of WNV transmission during winter.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationAnimalsCaliforniaCrowsCulexFecesLinear ModelsSeasonsWest Nile FeverWest Nile virusAmerican Crowbird-to-bird transmissionCorvus brachyrhynchosCulexWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID26335475
PMCPMC4592346
OpenAlexW2170220447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.