Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335425›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Self-organization in Balanced State Networks by STDP and Homeostatic Plasticity.

Felix Effenberger, Jürgen Jost, Anna Levina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Homeostatic Plasticity Enables Stable yet Tunable Neuronal Assemblies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Representational drift and learning-induced stabilization in the piriform cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synapse-type-specific competitive Hebbian learning forms functional recurrent networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Theoretical foundations of studying criticality in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Divergent Synaptic Scaling of Miniature EPSCs following Activity Blockade in Dissociated Neuronal Cultures.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Activity Dependent and Independent Determinants of Synaptic Size Diversity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuronal Degeneration Impairs Rhythms Between Connected Microcircuits.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix EffenbergerMax-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Jürgen JostMax-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Anna LevinaMax-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural inhomogeneities in synaptic efficacies have a strong impact on population response dynamics of cortical networks and are believed to play an important role in their functioning. However, little is known about how such inhomogeneities could evolve by means of synaptic plasticity. Here we present an adaptive model of a balanced neuronal network that combines two different types of plasticity, STDP and synaptic scaling. The plasticity rules yield both long-tailed distributions of synaptic weights and firing rates. Simultaneously, a highly connected subnetwork of driver neurons with strong synapses emerges. Coincident spiking activity of several driver cells can evoke population bursts and driver cells have similar dynamical properties as leader neurons found experimentally. Our model allows us to observe the delicate interplay between structural and dynamical properties of the emergent inhomogeneities. It is simple, robust to parameter changes and able to explain a multitude of different experimental findings in one basic network.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalComputational BiologyNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID26335425
PMCPMC4559467
OpenAlexW1884265787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.