ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016
Defining the optimal systolic phase targets using absolute delay time for reconstructions in dual-source coronary CT angiography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiation dose optimization in coronary CT angiography clinical application of absolute phase gating in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Velocimetry based on multiphase CCTA images for reliable coronary flow velocity quantification across stenosis severities and ischemia detection.Medical physics · 2026Article
- QRS-Corrected Prediction of the Diastolic Rest Period for Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Complete Left Bundle Branch Block.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Feasibility of alternative trigger deletion to improve 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography quality in patients with increased heart rate.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Plaque Burden and 1-Year Outcomes in Acute Chest Pain: Results From the Multicenter RAPID-CTCA Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Distinguishing Type 1 from Type 2 Myocardial Infarction by Using CT Coronary Angiography.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- A proof of concept treatment planning study of gated proton radiotherapy for cardiac soft tissue sarcoma.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Topical issue: multimodality imaging in atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Article
- Coronary CT angiography in the emergency department utilizing second and third generation dual source CT.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To define the optimal systolic phase for dual-source computed tomography angiography using an absolute reconstruction delay time after the R-R interval based on the coronary artery motion, we analyzed images reconstructed between 200 and 420 miliseconds (ms) after the R wave at 20 ms increments in 21 patients. Based on the American Heart Association coronary segmentation guidelines, the origin of six coronary artery landmarks (RCA, AM1, PDA, LM, OM1, and D2) were selected to calculate the coronary artery motion velocity. The velocity of the given landmark was defined as the quotient of the route and the length of the time interval. The x, y and z-coordinates of the selected landmark were recorded, and were used for the calculation of the 3D route of coronary artery motion by using a specific equation. Differences in velocities were assessed by analysis of variance for repeated measures; Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for multiple pair wise comparisons. 1488 landmarks were measured (6 locations at 12 systolic time points) in 21 patients and were analyzed. The mean values of the minimum velocities were calculated separately for each heart rate group (i.e. <65; 65-80; and >80 bpm). The mean lowest coronary artery velocities in each segment occurred in the middle period of each time interval of the acquired systolic phase i.e. 280-340 ms. No differences were found in the minimal coronary artery velocities between the three HR groups, with the exception of the AM1 branch (p = 0.00495) between <65 and >80 bpm (p = 0.03), and at HRs of 65-80 versus >80 bpm (p = 0.006). During an absolute delay of 200-420 ms after the R-wave, the ideal reconstruction interval varies significantly among coronary artery segments. Decreased velocities occur between 280 to 340 ms. Therefore a narrow range of systolic intervals, rather than a single phase, should be acquired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.