Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335369›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016

Defining the optimal systolic phase targets using absolute delay time for reconstructions in dual-source coronary CT angiography.

Csilla Celeng, Harshna Vadvala, Stefan Puchner, Amit Pursnani, Umesh Sharma, Attila Kovacs, Pâl Maurovich-Horvat, Udo Hoffmann, Brian Ghoshhajra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Topical issue: multimodality imaging in atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016
    Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Csilla CelengCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. celengcsilla@gmail.com.
Harshna VadvalaCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. hvadvala@partners.org.
Stefan PuchnerCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. Stefan.puchner@meduniwien.ac.at.
Amit PursnaniCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. amit.pursnani@gmail.com.
Umesh SharmaCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. umeshsharmaphd@yahoo.com.
Attila KovacsMTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 68 Varosmajor Street, 1122, Budapest, Hungary. kovatti@gmail.com.
Pâl Maurovich-HorvatMTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 68 Varosmajor Street, 1122, Budapest, Hungary. maurovich.horvat@gmail.com.
Udo HoffmannCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. uhoffmann@partners.org.
Brian GhoshhajraCardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. bghoshhajra@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

Cardiac MR and CT ResearchT32HL076136 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NEILAN, TOMAS G · 2004 to 2019
$4.9M
Cardiovascular Imaging in Ischemic Heart DiseaseK24HL113128 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2012 to 2020
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL113128NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To define the optimal systolic phase for dual-source computed tomography angiography using an absolute reconstruction delay time after the R-R interval based on the coronary artery motion, we analyzed images reconstructed between 200 and 420 miliseconds (ms) after the R wave at 20 ms increments in 21 patients. Based on the American Heart Association coronary segmentation guidelines, the origin of six coronary artery landmarks (RCA, AM1, PDA, LM, OM1, and D2) were selected to calculate the coronary artery motion velocity. The velocity of the given landmark was defined as the quotient of the route and the length of the time interval. The x, y and z-coordinates of the selected landmark were recorded, and were used for the calculation of the 3D route of coronary artery motion by using a specific equation. Differences in velocities were assessed by analysis of variance for repeated measures; Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for multiple pair wise comparisons. 1488 landmarks were measured (6 locations at 12 systolic time points) in 21 patients and were analyzed. The mean values of the minimum velocities were calculated separately for each heart rate group (i.e. <65; 65-80; and >80 bpm). The mean lowest coronary artery velocities in each segment occurred in the middle period of each time interval of the acquired systolic phase i.e. 280-340 ms. No differences were found in the minimal coronary artery velocities between the three HR groups, with the exception of the AM1 branch (p = 0.00495) between <65 and >80 bpm (p = 0.03), and at HRs of 65-80 versus >80 bpm (p = 0.006). During an absolute delay of 200-420 ms after the R-wave, the ideal reconstruction interval varies significantly among coronary artery segments. Decreased velocities occur between 280 to 340 ms. Therefore a narrow range of systolic intervals, rather than a single phase, should be acquired.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsAnatomic LandmarksBlood Flow VelocityCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAbsolute delay timeCoronary CT angiographyDual-source CTSystolic phase targets

Identifiers

PMID26335369
PMCPMC5943709
OpenAlexW1260070650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.