Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335304›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes.

Vijay Rajagopal, Gregory Bass, Cameron G Walker, David J Crossman, Amorita Petzer, Anthony Hickey, Ivo Siekmann, Masahiko Hoshijima, Mark H Ellisman, Edmund J Crampin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CaPhysiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CaBiophysical journal · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Computational modeling of single-cell mechanics and cytoskeletal mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vijay RajagopalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Systems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Gregory BassSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Cameron G WalkerDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
David J CrossmanDepartment of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Amorita PetzerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland. New Zealand.
Anthony HickeySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland. New Zealand.
Ivo SiekmannDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Masahiko HoshijimaDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, United States of America; National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California San Diego, San Diego, United States of America.
Mark H EllismanNational Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California San Diego, San Diego, United States of America.
Edmund J CrampinSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Christian SoellerDepartment of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Biomedical Physics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

VOLUMETRIC CONTOUR-BASED SURFACE RECONSTRUCTIONP41RR004050 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AKASSOGLOU, KATERINA · 1989 to 2011
$28.0M
IVEM and Image Analysis ResourceP41GM103412 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELLISMAN, MARK H · 2012 to 2019
$17.9M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR004050NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatio-temporal dynamics of intracellular calcium, [Ca2+]i, regulate the contractile function of cardiac muscle cells. Measuring [Ca2+]i flux is central to the study of mechanisms that underlie both normal cardiac function and calcium-dependent etiologies in heart disease. However, current imaging techniques are limited in the spatial resolution to which changes in [Ca2+]i can be detected. Using spatial point process statistics techniques we developed a novel method to simulate the spatial distribution of RyR clusters, which act as the major mediators of contractile Ca2+ release, upon a physiologically-realistic cellular landscape composed of tightly-packed mitochondria and myofibrils. We applied this method to computationally combine confocal-scale (~ 200 nm) data of RyR clusters with 3D electron microscopy data (~ 30 nm) of myofibrils and mitochondria, both collected from adult rat left ventricular myocytes. Using this hybrid-scale spatial model, we simulated reaction-diffusion of [Ca2+]i during the rising phase of the transient (first 30 ms after initiation). At 30 ms, the average peak of the simulated [Ca2+]i transient and of the simulated fluorescence intensity signal, F/F0, reached values similar to that found in the literature ([Ca2+]i ≈1 μM; F/F0≈5.5). However, our model predicted the variation in [Ca2+]i to be between 0.3 and 12.7 μM (~3 to 100 fold from resting value of 0.1 μM) and the corresponding F/F0 signal ranging from 3 to 9.5. We demonstrate in this study that: (i) heterogeneities in the [Ca2+]i transient are due not only to heterogeneous distribution and clustering of mitochondria; (ii) but also to heterogeneous local densities of RyR clusters. Further, we show that: (iii) these structure-induced heterogeneities in [Ca2+]i can appear in line scan data. Finally, using our unique method for generating RyR cluster distributions, we demonstrate the robustness in the [Ca2+]i transient to differences in RyR cluster distributions measured between rat and human cardiomyocytes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCalcium SignalingComputational BiologyComputer SimulationMaleMitochondriaModels, BiologicalMyocytes, CardiacMyofibrilsRatsRats, WistarRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release ChannelCalciumRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel

Identifiers

PMID26335304
PMCPMC4559435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.