ArticlePloS one2015
Correction: Variable Classification of Drug-Intoxication Suicides across US States: A Partial Artifact of Forensics?
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Vital Records to Improve Identification of Suicide as Manner of Death for Opioid-Related Fatalities.Crisis · 2026Article
- Identifying and characterizing suicide decedent subtypes using deep embedded clustering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Psychiatric diagnoses are associated with means selection in united states suicide deaths.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Article
- Opioid overdose deaths and potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing practices (PIP): A spatial epidemiological study.The International journal on drug policy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.