Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26335184›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

WiseScaffolder: an algorithm for the semi-automatic scaffolding of Next Generation Sequencing data.

Gregory K Farrant, Mark Hoebeke, Frédéric Partensky, Gwendoline Andres, Erwan Corre, Laurence Garczarek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adaptation to Blue Light in MarineFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory K FarrantSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique, CS 90074, 29688, Roscoff cedex, France.
Mark HoebekeCNRS, FR 2424, ABiMS Platform, Station Biologique, Place Georges Teissier, CS 90074, 29688, Roscoff cedex, France.
Frédéric PartenskySorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique, CS 90074, 29688, Roscoff cedex, France.
Gwendoline AndresCNRS, FR 2424, ABiMS Platform, Station Biologique, Place Georges Teissier, CS 90074, 29688, Roscoff cedex, France.
Erwan CorreCNRS, FR 2424, ABiMS Platform, Station Biologique, Place Georges Teissier, CS 90074, 29688, Roscoff cedex, France.
Laurence GarczarekSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique, CS 90074, 29688, Roscoff cedex, France. laurence.garczarek@sb-roscoff.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe sequencing depth provided by high-throughput sequencing technologies has allowed a rise in the number of de novo sequenced genomes that could potentially be closed without further sequencing. However, genome scaffolding and closure require costly human supervision that often results in genomes being published as drafts. A number of automatic scaffolders were recently released, which improved the global quality of genomes published in the last few years. Yet, none of them reach the efficiency of manual scaffolding.

resultsHere, we present an innovative semi-automatic scaffolder that additionally helps with chimerae resolution and generates valuable contig maps and outputs for manual improvement of the automatic scaffolding. This software was tested on the newly sequenced marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH8103 as well as two reference datasets used in previous studies, Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Homo sapiens chromosome 14 (http://gage.cbcb.umd.edu/). The quality of resulting scaffolds was compared to that of three other stand-alone scaffolders: SSPACE, SOPRA and SCARPA. For all three model organisms, WiseScaffolder produced better results than other scaffolders in terms of contiguity statistics (number of genome fragments, N50, LG50, etc.) and, in the case of WH8103, the reliability of the scaffolds was confirmed by whole genome alignment against a closely related reference genome. We also propose an efficient computer-assisted strategy for manual improvement of the scaffolding, using outputs generated by WiseScaffolder, as well as for genome finishing that in our hands led to the circularization of the WH8103 genome.

conclusionAltogether, WiseScaffolder proved more efficient than three other scaffolders for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes and is thus likely applicable to most genome projects. The scaffolding pipeline described here should be of particular interest to biologists wishing to take advantage of the high added value of complete genomes.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNASynechococcus

Identifiers

PMID26335184
PMCPMC4559175
OpenAlexW2128263817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.