Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334992›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2015

Networks that learn the precise timing of event sequences.

Alan Veliz-Cuba, Harel Z Shouval, Krešimir Josić, Zachary P Kilpatrick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characteristics of sequential activity in networks with temporally asymmetric Hebbian learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unsupervised Learning of Persistent and Sequential Activity.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan Veliz-CubaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. alanavc@math.uh.edu.
Harel Z ShouvalDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Harel.Shouval@uth.tmc.edu.
Krešimir JosićDepartment of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. josic@math.uh.edu.
Zachary P KilpatrickDepartment of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. zpkilpat@math.uh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2835-9416

Funding

Experimental and mathematical analysis of delay in transcripitional signalingR01GM104974 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, MATTHEW R. · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal circuits can learn and replay firing patterns evoked by sequences of sensory stimuli. After training, a brief cue can trigger a spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity similar to that evoked by a learned stimulus sequence. Network models show that such sequence learning can occur through the shaping of feedforward excitatory connectivity via long term plasticity. Previous models describe how event order can be learned, but they typically do not explain how precise timing can be recalled. We propose a mechanism for learning both the order and precise timing of event sequences. In our recurrent network model, long term plasticity leads to the learning of the sequence, while short term facilitation enables temporally precise replay of events. Learned synaptic weights between populations determine the time necessary for one population to activate another. Long term plasticity adjusts these weights so that the trained event times are matched during playback. While we chose short term facilitation as a time-tracking process, we also demonstrate that other mechanisms, such as spike rate adaptation, can fulfill this role. We also analyze the impact of trial-to-trial variability, showing how observational errors as well as neuronal noise result in variability in learned event times. The dynamics of the playback process determines how stochasticity is inherited in learned sequence timings. Future experiments that characterize such variability can therefore shed light on the neural mechanisms of sequence learning.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerTimeHumansLearningMachine LearningNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal CellsSynapsesTime PerceptionLong term plasticitySerial recallShort term facilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.