ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2015
Networks that learn the precise timing of event sequences.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised restoration of a complex learned behavior after large-scale neuronal perturbation.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Generation of focused drug molecule library using recurrent neural network.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Thunderstruck: The ACDC model of flexible sequences and rhythms in recurrent neural circuits.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- From synapse to network: models of information storage and retrieval in neural circuits.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Active Learning and the Potential of Neural Networks Accelerate Molecular Screening for the Design of a New Molecule Effective against SARS-CoV-2.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Characteristics of sequential activity in networks with temporally asymmetric Hebbian learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Neuronal mechanisms for sequential activation of memory items: Dynamics and reliability.PloS one · 2020Article
- Fast and flexible sequence induction in spiking neural networks via rapid excitability changes.eLife · 2019Article
- Probabilistic associative learning suffices for learning the temporal structure of multiple sequences.PloS one · 2019Article
- Unsupervised Learning of Persistent and Sequential Activity.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Generative Recurrent Networks for De Novo Drug Design.Molecular informatics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuronal circuits can learn and replay firing patterns evoked by sequences of sensory stimuli. After training, a brief cue can trigger a spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity similar to that evoked by a learned stimulus sequence. Network models show that such sequence learning can occur through the shaping of feedforward excitatory connectivity via long term plasticity. Previous models describe how event order can be learned, but they typically do not explain how precise timing can be recalled. We propose a mechanism for learning both the order and precise timing of event sequences. In our recurrent network model, long term plasticity leads to the learning of the sequence, while short term facilitation enables temporally precise replay of events. Learned synaptic weights between populations determine the time necessary for one population to activate another. Long term plasticity adjusts these weights so that the trained event times are matched during playback. While we chose short term facilitation as a time-tracking process, we also demonstrate that other mechanisms, such as spike rate adaptation, can fulfill this role. We also analyze the impact of trial-to-trial variability, showing how observational errors as well as neuronal noise result in variability in learned event times. The dynamics of the playback process determines how stochasticity is inherited in learned sequence timings. Future experiments that characterize such variability can therefore shed light on the neural mechanisms of sequence learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26334992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.