ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2015
Rehabilitation in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Participation and Its Effect on Prognosis.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal Model Building in the Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence based medicine: Update of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS-II).European journal of preventive cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS).European journal of preventive cardiology · 2016Pooled it
- Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in 1,100 cardiac rehabilitation patients with coronary heart disease: the LLT-R(ehabilitation) registry.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Adherence to drug therapy in patients with heart failure associated with reduced ejection fractions (HFrEF) during cardiac rehabilitation and after 3 and 6 months.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Lipid-Lowering Therapy during Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021Article
- Functional Improvement After Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients is Not Related to Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- Medication and Treatment Adherence Following Hospital Discharge.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
- Unrealistic View.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
- Two Very Different Patient Populations.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn Reply.2016
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, rehabilitation is considered to be indicated after an acute hospital stay for the treatment of a severe cardiac condition. In comparative studies, at least 51% of German hospital patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who were entitled to rehabilitative measures actually took part n rehabilitation.
methodsWe examined data on 1910 patients with CHD who took part in two prospective cohort studies at the University Hospital of Halle (Saale) in the years 2007-2011. We contacted these patients again with a questionnaire to determine which ones had undergone rehabilitation. For patients who died before we could contact them, the attempt was made to obtain the dates and causes of death from the local authorities. The primary endpoint of was overall mortality.
resultsThe median duration of follow-up was 136 ± 71 weeks. 727 patients (38.1%) had applied for rehabilitation during their acute hospitalization, but only 552 patients (28.9%) actually underwent it. Patients who did not undergo rehabilitation were older than those who did (68.6 ± 10.3 vs. 64.9 ± 10.5 years) and suffered more commonly from diabetes (41.3% vs. 33.7%; p = 0.002), arterial hypertension (89.2% vs. 85.3%; p = 0.017), and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (15.3% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.002). There were more smokers in the rehabilitation group. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis both showed that the patients who underwent rehabilitation had lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.067, 95% confidence interval 0.025-0.180, p < 0.001).
conclusionRehabilitation for cardiac patients was associated with lower mortality. Fewer patients underwent rehabilitation in this study than in other, comparable studies. Those who did not were older and had a greater burden of accompanying disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.