Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334879›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Patterns of diagnostic imaging and associated radiation exposure among long-term survivors of young adult cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Corinne Daly, David R Urbach, Thérèse A Stukel, Paul C Nathan, Wayne Deitel, Lawrence F Paszat, Andrew S Wilton, Nancy N Baxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corinne DalyDepartment of Surgery, Li Ki Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. dalyco@smh.ca.
David R UrbachDepartment of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. david.urbach@uhn.ca.
Thérèse A StukelInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada. stukel@ices.on.ca.
Paul C NathanInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada. paul.nathan@sickkids.ca.
Wayne DeitelDepartment of Radiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. wdeitel@rogers.com.
Lawrence F PaszatInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada. lawrence@ices.on.ca.
Andrew S WiltonInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada. drew.wilton@ices.on.ca.
Nancy N BaxterDepartment of Surgery, Li Ki Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. baxtern@smh.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 86590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of young adult malignancies are at risk of accumulated exposures to radiation from repetitive diagnostic imaging. We designed a population-based cohort study to describe patterns of diagnostic imaging and cumulative diagnostic radiation exposure among survivors of young adult cancer during a survivorship time period where surveillance imaging is not typically warranted.

methodsYoung adults aged 20-44 diagnosed with invasive malignancy in Ontario from 1992-1999 who lived at least 5 years from diagnosis were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry and matched 5 to 1 to randomly selected cancer-free persons. We determined receipt of 5 modalities of diagnostic imaging and associated radiation dose received by survivors and controls from years 5-15 after diagnosis or matched referent date through administrative data. Matched pairs were censored six months prior to evidence of recurrence.

results20,911 survivors and 104,524 controls had a median of 13.5 years observation. Survivors received all modalities of diagnostic imaging at significantly higher rates than controls. Survivors received CT at a 3.49-fold higher rate (95% Confidence Interval [CI]:3.37, 3.62) than controls in years 5 to 15 after diagnosis. Survivors received a mean radiation dose of 26 miliSieverts solely from diagnostic imaging in the same time period, a 4.57-fold higher dose than matched controls (95% CI: 4.39, 4.81).

conclusionsLong-term survivors of young adult cancer have a markedly higher rate of diagnostic imaging over time than matched controls, imaging associated with substantial radiation exposure, during a time period when surveillance is not routinely recommended.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureSurvivorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26334879
PMCPMC4559270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.