Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334843›Full record

Observational studyQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

The influence of the refractive correction on the vision-related quality of life in keratoconus patients.

Sara Ortiz-Toquero, Sofia Perez, Guadalupe Rodriguez, Victoria de Juan, Agustin Mayo-Iscar, Raul Martin

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quality of life and tomography indices in patients with keratoconus.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Ortiz-ToqueroDepartamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 7 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.
Sofia PerezOptometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Guadalupe RodriguezDepartamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 7 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.
Victoria de JuanDepartamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 7 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.
Agustin Mayo-IscarDepartamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa e IMUVA, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 7 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.
Raul MartinDepartamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 7 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011, Valladolid, Spain. raul@ioba.med.uva.es.
Universidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of refractive correction [spectacles vs rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGP CLs)] on the vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL) obtained with the standardized questionnaire, NEI-VFQ-25, in keratoconus patients compared with healthy myopic subjects.

methodsThe Spanish version of NEI-VFQ-25 was administered two consecutive times to 25 keratoconus patients (RGP CL wearers) and 25 healthy myopic subjects (RGP and soft CL wearers). The first time was to assess the VR-QoL for spectacle wearing, such as those for refractive correction, and the second time was for CL wearing.

resultsKeratoconus patients showed a lower VR-QoL impairment (P < 0.01) than healthy subjects in the total and all subscale score of NEI-VFQ-25 related to wearing spectacles. With CL correction, keratoconus patients showed a VR-QoL improvement with statistically significant differences (P < 0.04) in only four subscales, including distance activities, mental health, color vision and peripheral vision, compared with healthy subjects. In the keratoconus group, compared to spectacle use, CL wear improved the VR-QoL score (P = 0.01) and all subscales except for ocular pain (P < 0.01) and mental health (P = 0.25).

conclusionsThe use of the NEI-VFQ-25 to explore the difference in the VR-QoL between healthy subjects and patients with keratoconus provides further evidence of improved VR-QoL with RGP CL wear compared with spectacles in keratoconus patients. RGP CL management in keratoconus patients could minimize the impact of the disease on the patient's well-being.

Indexed as

Contact LensesEyeglassesQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansKeratoconusMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesVision, OcularYoung AdultKeratoconusQuality of LifeRefractive correctionRigid gas-permeable contact lens management

Identifiers

PMID26334843
OpenAlexW1265201066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.