Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334763›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

A Review: The Current In Vivo Models for the Discovery and Utility of New Anti-leishmanial Drugs Targeting Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Emily Rose Mears, Farrokh Modabber, Robert Don, George E Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Indazole Derivatives Against Murine Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Anti-Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect of topical berberine in murine cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  18. Therapeutic effect of oral quercetin in hamsters infected withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Emily Rose MearsCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Farrokh ModabberDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Geneva, Switzerland; Center for Research and Training on Skin Diseases and Leprosy (CRTSDL), Tehran University Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Robert DonDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Geneva, Switzerland.
George E JohnsonCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Swansea University · GBDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current in vivo models for the utility and discovery of new potential anti-leishmanial drugs targeting Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) differ vastly in their immunological responses to the disease and clinical presentation of symptoms. Animal models that show similarities to the human form of CL after infection with Leishmania should be more representative as to the effect of the parasite within a human. Thus, these models are used to evaluate the efficacy of new anti-leishmanial compounds before human clinical trials. Current animal models aim to investigate (i) host-parasite interactions, (ii) pathogenesis, (iii) biochemical changes/pathways, (iv) in vivo maintenance of parasites, and (v) clinical evaluation of drug candidates. This review focuses on the trends of infection observed between Leishmania parasites, the predictability of different strains, and the determination of parasite load. These factors were used to investigate the overall effectiveness of the current animal models. The main aim was to assess the efficacy and limitations of the various CL models and their potential for drug discovery and evaluation. In conclusion, we found that the following models are the most suitable for the assessment of anti-leishmanial drugs: L. major-C57BL/6 mice (or-vervet monkey, or-rhesus monkeys), L. tropica-CsS-16 mice, L. amazonensis-CBA mice, L. braziliensis-golden hamster (or-rhesus monkey). We also provide in-depth guidance for which models are not suitable for these investigations.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsChlorocebus aethiopsDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMacaca mulattaMesocricetusMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBAAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID26334763
PMCPMC4559374
OpenAlexW1868085246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.