Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334731›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2015

In silico analyses of metagenomes from human atherosclerotic plaque samples.

Suparna Mitra, Daniela I Drautz-Moses, Morten Alhede, Myat T Maw, Yang Liu, Rikky W Purbojati, Zhei H Yap, Kavita K Kushwaha, Alexandra G Gheorghe, Thomas Bjarnsholt and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Potential effects of probiotics on atherosclerosis.Microbiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Metagenomic Study of the MESA: Detection ofJournal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Suparna MitraSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. suparna.mitra@ifr.ac.uk.
Daniela I Drautz-MosesSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. danielamoses@pmail.ntu.edu.sg.
Morten AlhedeCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. malhede@sund.ku.dk.
Myat T MawSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. MYAT@ntu.edu.sg.
Yang LiuSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. Liu_Yang@ntu.edu.sg.
Rikky W PurbojatiSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. RPurbojati@ntu.edu.sg.
Zhei H YapSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. ZHYap@ntu.edu.sg.
Kavita K KushwahaSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. k.kushwaha@ntu.edu.sg.
Alexandra G GheorgheThe Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Alexandra.Gheorghe@sund.ku.dk.
Thomas BjarnsholtCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. tbjarnsholt@sund.ku.dk.
Gorm M HansenCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. gormmh@gmail.com.
Henrik H SillesenThe Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. henrik.hegaard.sillesen@regionh.dk.
Hans P HougenThe Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Hans.Petter.Hougen@sund.ku.dk.
Peter R HansenDepartment of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. prh@dadlnet.dk.
Liang YangSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. YangLiang@ntu.edu.sg.
Tim Tolker-NielsenCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. ttn@sund.ku.dk.
Stephan C SchusterSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. SCSchuster@ntu.edu.sg.
Michael GivskovSingapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering (SCELSE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. mgivskov@sund.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKSingapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering · SGNanyang Technological University · SGGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrough several observational and mechanistic studies, microbial infection is known to promote cardiovascular disease. Direct infection of the vessel wall, along with the cardiovascular risk factors, is hypothesized to play a key role in the atherogenesis by promoting an inflammatory response leading to endothelial dysfunction and generating a proatherogenic and prothrombotic environment ultimately leading to clinical manifestations of cardiovascular disease, e.g., acute myocardial infarction or stroke. There are many reports of microbial DNA isolation and even a few studies of viable microbes isolated from human atherosclerotic vessels. However, high-resolution investigation of microbial infectious agents from human vessels that may contribute to atherosclerosis is very limited. In spite of the progress in recent sequencing technologies, analyzing host-associated metagenomes remain a challenge.

resultsTo investigate microbiome diversity within human atherosclerotic tissue samples, we employed high-throughput metagenomic analysis on: (1) atherosclerotic plaques obtained from a group of patients who underwent endarterectomy due to recent transient cerebral ischemia or stroke. (2) Presumed stabile atherosclerotic plaques obtained from autopsy from a control group of patients who all died from causes not related to cardiovascular disease. Our data provides evidence that suggest a wide range of microbial agents in atherosclerotic plaques, and an intriguing new observation that shows these microbiota displayed differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques as judged from the taxonomic profiles in these two groups of patients. Additionally, functional annotations reveal significant differences in basic metabolic and disease pathway signatures between these groups.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the feasibility of novel high-resolution techniques aimed at identification and characterization of microbial genomes in human atherosclerotic tissue samples. Our analysis suggests that distinct groups of microbial agents might play different roles during the development of atherosclerotic plaques. These findings may serve as a reference point for future studies in this area of research.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMicrobiotaAtherosclerosisBiodiversityCluster AnalysisDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMalePlaque, Atherosclerotic

Identifiers

PMID26334731
PMCPMC4559171
OpenAlexW1806022110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.