SynthesisApplied health economics and health policy2016
A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Biomarkers.
Synthesis in Applied health economics and health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of novel biomarkers for the early detection and management of acute kidney injury: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Economic Evaluations of Imaging Biomarker-Driven Companion Diagnostics for Cancer: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- How are we evaluating the cost-effectiveness of companion biomarkers for targeted cancer therapies? A systematic review.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of community acquired pneumonia management strategies: A systematic review of literature.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests in Brazil: How accurate are the results?Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of modeling approaches to evaluate diagnostics programs for stable coronary heart disease: suggestions for future health economic models.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Blood-based epigenetic biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis: current knowledge and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the current standard of care and of the haematology analyser XN31-microscopy combination for diagnosing malaria in a nonendemic country.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2026Article
- Measuring efficacy for myasthenia gravis treatments: A review of biomarkers used in clinical trials.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2025Review
- The Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Provocative Discography in the Identification of Chronic Low Back Pain Surgery Candidates.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for biomarker discovery in Alzheimer's disease and dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Review
- Cost-effectiveness of treatment optimisation with biomarkers for immunotherapy in solid tumours: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Has the development of cancer biomarkers to guide treatment improved health outcomes?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Article
- Molecular biomarkers and precision medicine in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of health economic analyses.Oncotarget · 2019Review
- Toward Alignment in the Reporting of Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests and Biomarkers: The AGREEDT Checklist.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018Review
- Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work.Applied health economics and health policy · 2018Article
- Precision Medicine: From Science To Value.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2018Review
- The economic case for precision medicine.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2018Article
- Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic biomarkers have multiple applications along the care process and have a large potential in optimizing treatment decisions. However, many diagnostic biomarkers struggle to gain market access and obtain appropriate coverage because of a lack of evidence on their health economic impact.
objectivesThe aim was to review the (methodological) characteristics of recent economic evaluations on diagnostic biomarkers and examine whether these studies dealt with specific issues such as different payer perspectives, preference heterogeneity, and multiple applications in subpopulations.
methodsThe PubMed database and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched. Full economic evaluations published after 2009 assessing diagnostic biomarkers for the main non-communicable diseases in middle-income or high-income countries were considered eligible. Empirical and methodological study characteristics were summarized, as was the handling of specific issues related to the economic evaluation of personalized medicine.
resultsThirty-three economic evaluations were included, of which 25 were model-based analyses. The number of strategies compared ranged from two to 17 per study, and was especially large in studies assessing genetic testing in patients and their relatives. Cost-effectiveness results were most sensitive to test accuracy and costs of the biomarker (N = 7), the relative risk of an event (N = 4), and the proportion of people accepting genetic testing (N = 2). One study incorporated patient preferences, and none of the studies considered different payer perspectives, cost sharing arrangements or variable opportunity costs due to population density variability.
conclusionsPublished health economic evaluations of biomarkers used for diagnosing, staging diseases, and guiding treatment selection are characterized by a large number of comparators to model the potential clinical applications and to determine their value. Assessing outcomes beyond health as well as specific issues, such as different payer perspectives and patient preferences, is crucial to fully capture the potential health economic impact of diagnostic biomarkers and to inform value-based reimbursement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.