Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334522›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2016

The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Nabil Amara, Jolyane Blouin-Bougie, Jalila Jbilou, Norrin Halilem, Jacques Simard, Réjean Landry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nabil AmaraDepartment of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. Nabil.amara@fsa.ulaval.ca.
Jolyane Blouin-BougieDepartment of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. Jolyane.blouin-bougie@fsa.ulaval.ca.
Jalila JbilouNew Brunswick Medical Training Centre and School of Psychology, University of Monction, Moncton, NB, Canada. jalila.jbilou@umoncton.ca.
Norrin HalilemDepartment of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. Norrin.halilem@fsa.ulaval.ca.
Jacques SimardCancer Genomics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. jacques.simard@crchul.ulaval.ca.
Réjean LandryDepartment of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. Rejean.landry@fsa.ulaval.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research CRN-8752-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: to analyze the genetic counseling process for breast cancer with a theoretical knowledge transfer lens and to compare generalists, medical specialists, and genetic counselors with regards to their genetic counseling practices. This paper presents the genetic counseling process occurring within a chain of value-adding activities of four main stages describing health professionals' clinical practices: (1) evaluation, (2) investigation, (3) information, and (4) decision. It also presents the results of a cross-sectional study based on a Canadian medical doctors and genetic counselors survey (n = 176) realized between July 2012 and March 2013. The statistical exercise included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests. The results indicate that even though all types of health professionals are involved in the entire process of genetic counseling for breast cancer, genetic counselors are more involved in the evaluation of breast cancer risk, while medical doctors are more active in the decision toward breast cancer risk management strategies. The results secondly demonstrate the relevance and the key role of genetic counselors in the care provided to women at-risk of familial breast cancer. This paper presents an integrative framework to understand the current process of genetic counseling for breast cancer in Canada, and to shed light on how and where health professionals contribute to the process. It also offers a starting point for assessing clinical practices in genetic counseling in order to establish more clearly where and to what extent efforts should be undertaken to implement future genetic services.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMedical OncologyPhysiciansRisk AssessmentCanadian health care providersFamilial breast cancerGenetic counselingKnowledge managementKnowledge value chainRisk communicationRisk prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.