Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334014›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Impact of cercal air currents on singing motor pattern generation in the cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer).

Pedro F Jacob, Berthold Hedwig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modular timer networks: abdominal interneurons controlling the chirp and pulse pattern in a cricket calling song.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  2. Structure, Activity and Function of a Singing CPG Interneuron Controlling Cricket Species-Specific Acoustic Signaling.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro F JacobDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-4858
Berthold HedwigDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and bh202@cam.ac.uk.
Champalimaud Foundation · PTUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F008783/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cercal system of crickets detects low-frequency air currents produced by approaching predators and self-generated air currents during singing, which may provide sensory feedback to the singing motor network. We analyzed the effect of cercal stimulation on singing motor pattern generation to reveal the response of a singing interneuron to predator-like signals and to elucidate the possible role of self-generated air currents during singing. In fictive singing males, we recorded an interneuron of the singing network while applying air currents to the cerci; additionally, we analyzed the effect of abolishing the cercal system in freely singing males. In fictively singing crickets, the effect of short air stimuli is either to terminate prematurely or to lengthen the interchirp interval, depending on their phase in the chirp cycle. Within our stimulation paradigm, air stimuli of different velocities and durations always elicited an inhibitory postsynaptic potential in the singing interneuron. Current injection in the singing interneuron elicited singing motor activity, even during the air current-evoked inhibitory input from the cercal pathway. The disruptive effects of air stimuli on the fictive singing pattern and the inhibitory response of the singing interneuron point toward the cercal system being involved in initiating avoidance responses in singing crickets, according to the established role of cerci in a predator escape pathway. After abolishing the activity of the cercal system, the timing of natural singing activity was not significantly altered. Our study provides no evidence that self-generated cercal sensory activity has a feedback function for singing motor pattern generation.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAir MovementsAnimalsBrainCentral Pattern GeneratorsFeedback, SensoryGanglia, InvertebrateGryllidaeInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsInterneuronsMaleMechanoreceptorsPhysical StimulationVocalization, Animalair stimuluscercal sensory systemescape responsesinging central pattern generator interneuron

Identifiers

PMID26334014
PMCPMC4643095
OpenAlexW2107737282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.