ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015
Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haptic signals enhance vestibular self-motion perception and reduces vestibular misperception.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Balance, Gait Kinematics, and Fear of Falling After a Four-Month Targeted Training Program in a Patient with Cervical Dystonia: A Case Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Influence of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the parietal cortex on postural control: a single-blind randomized crossover study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Perceptual-motor styles.Experimental brain research · 2021Review
- Specific Posture-Stabilising Effects of Vision and Touch Are Revealed by Distinct Changes of Body Oscillation Frequencies.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Article
- The effect of light touch on standing sway when the stability of the external touch reference becomes unreliable.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Balance in Blind Subjects: Cane and Fingertip Touch Induce Similar Extent and Promptness of Stance Stabilization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Postural Stabilization Strategies to Motor Contagion Induced by Action Observation Are Impaired in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Body sway adaptation to addition but not withdrawal of stabilizing visual information is delayed by a concurrent cognitive task.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Body Sway Increases After Functional Inactivation of the Cerebellar Vermis by cTBS.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2017Article
- Postural Ataxia in Cerebellar Downbeat Nystagmus: Its Relation to Visual, Proprioceptive and Vestibular Signals and Cerebellar Atrophy.PloS one · 2017Article
- Haptic Cues for Balance: Use of a Cane Provides Immediate Body Stabilization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- Sensory reweighting dynamics following removal and addition of visual and proprioceptive cues.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Holding a Handle for Balance during Continuous Postural Perturbations-Immediate and Transitionary Effects on Whole Body Posture.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Calibration of the Leg Muscle Responses Elicited by Predictable Perturbations of Stance and the Effect of Vision.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the integration time of haptic and visual input and their interaction during stance stabilization. Eleven subjects performed four tandem-stance conditions (60 trials each). Vision, touch, and both vision and touch were added and withdrawn. Furthermore, vision was replaced with touch and vice versa. Body sway, tibialis anterior, and peroneus longus activity were measured. Following addition or withdrawal of vision or touch, an integration time period elapsed before the earliest changes in sway were observed. Thereafter, sway varied exponentially to a new steady-state while reweighting occurred. Latencies of sway changes on sensory addition ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 s across subjects, consistently longer for touch than vision, and were regularly preceded by changes in muscle activity. Addition of vision and touch simultaneously shortened the latencies with respect to vision or touch separately, suggesting cooperation between sensory modalities. Latencies following withdrawal of vision or touch or both simultaneously were shorter than following addition. When vision was replaced with touch or vice versa, adding one modality did not interfere with the effect of withdrawal of the other, suggesting that integration of withdrawal and addition were performed in parallel. The time course of the reweighting process to reach the new steady-state was also shorter on withdrawal than addition. The effects of different sensory inputs on posture stabilization illustrate the operation of a time-consuming, possibly supraspinal process that integrates and fuses modalities for accurate balance control. This study also shows the facilitatory interaction of visual and haptic inputs in integration and reweighting of stance-stabilizing inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.