Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26334008›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Feedback control of variability in the cycle period of a central pattern generator.

Ryan M Hooper, Ruben A Tikidji-Hamburyan, Carmen C Canavier, Astrid A Prinz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IeLife · 2024
    Article
  2. IbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan M HooperDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; ryan.hooper@gatech.edu.
Ruben A Tikidji-HamburyanDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana;
Carmen C CanavierDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; Neuroscience Center for Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; and.
Astrid A PrinzDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

Synchronization in Noisy, Heterogeneous Excitatory/Inhibitory NetworksR01NS054281 · NINDS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI CANAVIER, CARMEN CASTRO · 2005 to 2022
$5.4M
Multiphoton ConfocalP30GM103340 · NIGMS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI BAZAN, NICOLAS G. · 2012 to 2016
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103340NIGMS NIH HHS P30-GM-103340NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054281NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS-054281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We address how feedback to a bursting biological pacemaker with intrinsic variability in cycle length can affect that variability. Specifically, we examine a hybrid circuit constructed of an isolated crab anterior burster (AB)/pyloric dilator (PD) pyloric pacemaker receiving virtual feedback via dynamic clamp. This virtual feedback generates artificial synaptic input to PD with timing determined by adjustable phase response dynamics that mimic average burst intervals generated by the lateral pyloric neuron (LP) in the intact pyloric network. Using this system, we measure network period variability dependence on the feedback element's phase response dynamics and find that a constant response interval confers minimum variability. We further find that these optimal dynamics are characteristic of the biological pyloric network. Building upon our previous theoretical work mapping the firing intervals in one cycle onto the firing intervals in the next cycle, we create a theoretical map of the distribution of all firing intervals in one cycle to the distribution of firing intervals in the next cycle. We then obtain an integral equation for a stationary self-consistent distribution of the network periods of the hybrid circuit, which can be solved numerically given the uncoupled pacemaker's distribution of intrinsic periods, the nature of the network's feedback, and the phase resetting characteristics of the pacemaker. The stationary distributions obtained in this manner are strongly predictive of the experimentally observed distributions of hybrid network period. This theoretical framework can provide insight into optimal feedback schemes for minimizing variability to increase reliability or maximizing variability to increase flexibility in central pattern generators driven by pacemakers with feedback.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsFeedback, PhysiologicalModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBiological ClocksBrachyuraCentral Pattern GeneratorsGanglia, InvertebrateNeuronsPylorusfeedbackoscillationphase response curvepyloric networkvariability

Identifiers

PMID26334008
PMCPMC4644231
OpenAlexW2274593903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.