ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2015
Levator Plate Upward Lift on Dynamic Sonography and Levator Muscle Strength.
Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hiatus and pelvic floor failure patterns in pelvic organ prolapse: a 3D MRI study of structural interactions using a level III conceptual model.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Article
- AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of Urogynecological ultrasound examinations : Developed in collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and the SRU.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare digital palpation with levator plate lift measured by endovaginal and transperineal dynamic sonography.
methodsDynamic transperineal and endovaginal sonographic examinations were performed as part of multicompartmental pelvic floor functional assessment. Patients were instructed to perform Kegel contractions while a probe captured a video clip of levator plate movement at rest and during contraction in a 2-dimensional midsagittal posterior view. We measured the distance between the levator plate and the probe on endovaginal sonography as well as the distance between the levator plate and the gothic arch of the pubis on transperineal sonography. The change in diameter (lift) and levator plate lift ratio (lift/rest × 100) were calculated. Pelvic floor muscle strength was assessed by digital palpation and divided into functional and nonfunctional groups according to the Modified Oxford Scale. Mean differences in levator plate upward lift were compared by Modified Oxford Scale scores using Student t tests and analysis of variance.
resultsSeventy-four women were available for analysis. The mean age was 55 (SD, 11.9) years. When measured by vaginal dynamic sonography, mean lift and lift/rest ratio values increased with increasing Modified Oxford Scale score (analysis of variance, P= .09 and .04, respectively). When scores were categorized to represent nonfunctional (0-1) and functional (2-5) muscle strength groups, the mean lift (3.2 versus 4.6 mm; P = .03) and lift/rest ratio (13% versus 20%; P = .01) values were significantly higher in women with functional muscle strength. All patients with lift of 30% or greater detected by vaginal sonography had functional muscle strength.
conclusionsA greater levator plate lift ratio detected by dynamic endovaginal sonography was associated with higher muscle strength as determined by the Modified Oxford Scale. This novel measurement can be incorporated into sonographic evaluation of levator ani function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.