Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26333512›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2015

Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants.

Cathrina H Edwards, Myriam Ml Grundy, Terri Grassby, Dafni Vasilopoulou, Gary S Frost, Peter J Butterworth, Sarah Ee Berry, Jeremy Sanderson, Peter R Ellis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06152874 (The Combined Effect of Gluten Addition and Cell Wall Integrity in Durum Wheat Bread on Glycemic and Insulinemic Response in Vivo.), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06152874 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Combined Effect of Gluten Addition and Cell Wall Integrity in Durum Wheat Bread on Glycemic and Insulinemic Response in Vivo.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UdineRan2023 to 2023Enrolled16ConditionsGlucose Response, Glycemic Index, Insulin Response, Oral ProcessingArmsconsumption of glucose solution 1, consumption of glucose solution 2, consumption of Bread A and oral processing, consumption of Bread B and oral processing, consumption of Bread C and oral processing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effect of high-amyloseFood & function · 2022
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cathrina H EdwardsBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-0229
Myriam Ml GrundyBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;
Terri GrassbyBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;
Dafni VasilopoulouBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;
Gary S FrostNutrition and Dietetic Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Peter J ButterworthBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;
Sarah Ee BerryBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;
Jeremy SandersonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; and.
Peter R EllisBiopolymers Group, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; peter.r.ellis@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H004866/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L004259/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L502650/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCereal crops, particularly wheat, are a major dietary source of starch, and the bioaccessibility of starch has implications for postprandial glycemia. The structure and properties of plant foods have been identified as critical factors in influencing nutrient bioaccessibility; however, the physical and biochemical disassembly of cereal food during digestion has not been widely studied.

objectivesThe aims of this study were to compare the effects of 2 porridge meals prepared from wheat endosperm with different degrees of starch bioaccessibility on postprandial metabolism (e.g., glycemia) and to gain insight into the structural and biochemical breakdown of the test meals during gastroileal transit.

designA randomized crossover trial in 9 healthy ileostomy participants was designed to compare the effects of 55 g starch, provided as coarse (2-mm particles) or smooth (<0.2-mm particles) wheat porridge, on postprandial changes in blood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, lipids, and gut hormones and on the resistant starch (RS) content of ileal effluent. Undigested food in the ileal output was examined microscopically to identify cell walls and encapsulated starch.

resultsBlood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were significantly lower (i.e., 33%, 43%, 40%, and 50% lower 120-min incremental AUC, respectively) after consumption of the coarse porridge than after the smooth porridge (P < 0.01). In vitro, starch digestion was slower in the coarse porridge than in the smooth porridge (33% less starch digested at 90 min, P < 0.05, paired t test). In vivo, the structural integrity of coarse particles (∼2 mm) of wheat endosperm was retained during gastroileal transit. Microscopic examination revealed a progressive loss of starch from the periphery toward the particle core. The structure of the test meal had no effect on the amount or pattern of RS output.

conclusionThe structural integrity of wheat endosperm is largely retained during gastroileal digestion and has a primary role in influencing the rate of starch amylolysis and, consequently, postprandial metabolism. This trial was registered at isrctn.org as ISRCTN40517475.

Indexed as

Postprandial PeriodAdultAgedBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexC-PeptideCross-Over StudiesDietary CarbohydratesDigestionEndospermFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGastrointestinal HormonesHealthy VolunteersHumansBlood GlucoseC-PeptideDietary CarbohydratesFatty Acids, NonesterifiedGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGastrointestinal HormonesInsulinStarchTriglyceridesbioaccessibilitydigestionglycemiaileostomypostprandialstarchstructure

Identifiers

PMID26333512
PMCPMC4588739
OpenAlexW2113324865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.