Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26333383›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2015

Dual HER2/PIK3CA Targeting Overcomes Single-Agent Acquired Resistance in HER2-Amplified Uterine Serous Carcinoma Cell Lines In Vitro and In Vivo.

Salvatore Lopez, Emiliano Cocco, Jonathan Black, Stefania Bellone, Elena Bonazzoli, Federica Predolini, Francesca Ferrari, Carlton L Schwab, Diana P English, Elena Ratner and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Uterine serous carcinoma.Gynecologic oncology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvatore LopezDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Emiliano CoccoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jonathan BlackDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Stefania BelloneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Elena BonazzoliDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Federica PredoliniDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Francesca FerrariDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Carlton L SchwabDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Diana P EnglishDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Elena RatnerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Dan-Arin SilasiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Masoud AzodiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Peter E SchwartzDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Corrado TerranovaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto AngioliDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro D SantinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. alessandro.santin@yale.edu.
Yale University · USUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID L RIMM · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Integrated genomic analysis of racial disparities in endometrial cancerU01CA176067 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTIN, ALESSANDRO D · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
CPE Peptide-Based Nanoparticles for the Diagnosis and Therapy of Chemotherapy ResR01CA154460 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTIN, ALESSANDRO D · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA-16359NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154460NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154460-01NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176067NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176067-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HER2/neu gene amplification and PIK3CA driver mutations are common in uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and may represent ideal therapeutic targets against this aggressive variant of endometrial cancer. We examined the sensitivity to neratinib, taselisib, and the combination of the two compounds in in vitro and in vivo experiments using PIK3CA-mutated and PIK3CA wild-type HER2/neu-amplified USC cell lines. Cell viability and cell-cycle distribution were assessed using flow-cytometry assays. Downstream signaling was assessed by immunoblotting. Preclinical efficacy of single versus dual inhibition was evaluated in vivo using two USC xenografts. We found both single-agent neratinib and taselisib to be active but only transiently effective in controlling the in vivo growth of USC xenografts harboring HER2/neu gene amplification with or without oncogenic PIK3CA mutations. In contrast, the combination of the two inhibitors caused a stronger and long-lasting growth inhibition in both USC xenografts when compared with single-agent therapy. Combined targeting of HER2 and PIK3CA was associated with a significant and dose-dependent increase in the percentage of cells in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle and a dose-dependent decline in the phosphorylation of S6. Importantly, dual inhibition therapy initiated after tumor progression in single-agent-treated mice was still remarkably effective at inducing tumor regression in both large PIK3CA and pan-ErbB inhibitor-resistant USC xenografts. Dual HER2/PIK3CA blockade may represent a novel therapeutic option for USC patients harboring tumors with HER2/neu gene amplification and mutated or wild-type PIK3CA resistant to chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansImidazolesImmunoblotting2-(3-(2-(1-isopropyl-3-methyl-1H-1,2-4-triazol-5-yl)-5,6-dihydrobenzo(f)imidazo(1,2-d)(1,4)oxazepin-9-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-methylpropanamideClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImidazolesneratinibOxazepinesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPIK3CA protein, humanQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID26333383
PMCPMC4636465
OpenAlexW1746121681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.