Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2016
Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
Trial report in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of biodegradable and durable polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Lumen-Stent Mismatch Affects Long-Term Strut Healing After Primary PCI of Left Main Lesions: An Exploratory Follow-Up OCT Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Complementary Role of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Enhancing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Future Research Directions.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- A serial optical frequency-domain imaging study of early and late vascular responses to bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and stable coronary artery disease patients: results of the MECHANISM-ULTIMASTER study.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2022Article
- Drug-eluting coronary stents: insights from preclinical and pathology studies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- A serial 3- and 9-year optical coherence tomography assessment of vascular healing response to sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
- Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- Impact of lesion complexity on long-term vascular response to cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent: five-year follow-up optical coherence tomography study.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
- The Ultimaster Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: An Updated Review of Clinical Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe Ultimaster bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) is a newly developed drug-eluting stent (DES) that consists of a thin-strut, cobalt chromium with bioresorbable polymer coated only albuminally. We sought to compare tissue coverage in coronary lesions treated with BP-SES with the XIENCE permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PP-EES) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS AND
resultsA total of 36 patients participated in the CENTURY II trial in our institution and were randomly assigned to BP-SES (n = 15) and PP-EES (n = 21). Of these, 27 patients (13 BP-SES and 14 PP-EES) underwent OCT at 9-month follow-up. Tissue coverage and apposition were assessed on each strut, and the results in both groups were compared using multilevel logistic or linear regression models with random effects at three levels: patient, lesion, and struts. A total of 6450 struts (BP-SES, n = 2951; PP-EES, n = 3499) were analysed. Thirty and 79 uncovered struts (1.02 and 2.26%, P = 0.35), and 3 and 4 malapposed struts (0.10 and 0.11%, P = 0.94) were found in BP-SES and PP-EES groups, respectively. Mean neointimal thickness did not significantly differ between both groups (110 ± 10 vs. 93 ± 10 µm, P = 0.22). No significant differences in per cent neointimal volume obstruction (13.2 ± 4.6 vs. 10.5 ± 4.9%, P = 0.14) or other areas-volumetric parameters were detected between both groups.
conclusionBP-SES shows an excellent vascular healing response at 9-month follow-up, which is similar to PP-EES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.