Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26332700›Full record

SynthesisJAMA psychiatry2015

Meta-analysis of Functional Neuroimaging of Major Depressive Disorder in Youth.

Chris H Miller, J Paul Hamilton, Matthew D Sacchet, Ian H Gotlib

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Functional connectivity of salience and affective networks among remitted depressed patients predicts episode recurrence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chris H MillerStanford Neurosciences Institute, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
J Paul HamiltonLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Matthew D SacchetStanford Neurosciences Institute, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Ian H GotlibStanford Neurosciences Institute, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Neurosciences Institute · USLaureate Institute for Brain Research · USStanford University · US

Funding

Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Association Between Early Life Stress and Depression Across AdolescenceR37MH101495 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB · 2018 to 2026
$6.6M
Risk for Depression:Identifying and Altering Psychobiological MechanismsR01MH074849 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2006 to 2015
$6.2M
Interpretation Bias Training in Depressed Adolescents: Effects and MechanismsR21MH101545 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2013 to 2014
$432k
NIMH NIH HHS MH101545NIMH NIH HHS MH74849NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074849NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH101545NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH101495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceDespite its high prevalence and morbidity, the underlying neural basis of major depressive disorder (MDD) in youth is not well understood.

objectivesTo identify in youth diagnosed as having MDD the most reliable neural abnormalities reported in existing functional neuroimaging studies and characterize their relations with specific psychological dysfunctions. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify relevant studies published from November 2006 through February 2015. The current analysis took place from August 21, 2014, to March 28, 2015. STUDY SELECTION: We retained articles that conducted a comparison of youth aged 4 to 24 years diagnosed as having MDD and age-matched healthy controls using task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging and a voxelwise whole-brain approach. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted coordinates of brain regions exhibiting differential activity in youth with MDD compared with healthy control participants. Multilevel kernel density analysis was used to examine voxelwise between-group differences throughout the whole brain. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed by computing null hypothesis distributions from 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations and calculating the cluster size necessary to obtain the familywise error rate control at P < .05. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Abnormal levels of activation in youth diagnosed as having MDD compared with control participants during a variety of affective processing and executive functioning tasks.

resultsCompared with age-matched healthy control participants (n = 274), youth with MDD (n = 246) showed reliable patterns of abnormal activation, including the following task-general and task-specific effects: hyperactivation in subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (P < .05) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (P < .05) and hypoactivation in caudate (P < .01) across aggregated tasks; hyperactivation in thalamus (P < .03) and parahippocampal gyrus (P < .003) during affective processing tasks; hypoactivation in cuneus (P < .001), dorsal cingulate cortex (P < .05), and dorsal anterior insula (P < .05) during executive functioning tasks; hypoactivity in posterior insula (P < .005) during positive valence tasks; and hyperactivity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (P < .001) and superior temporal cortex (P < .003) during negative valence tasks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Altered activations in several distributed brain networks may help explain the following seemingly disparate symptoms of MDD in youth: hypervigilance toward emotional stimuli from the overactivation of central hubs in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and thalamus that lead to a cascade of other symptoms; ineffective emotion regulation despite increased activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during affective processing, which may reverse across development or the clinical course; maladaptive rumination and poor executive control from difficulties shifting from default mode network activity to task-positive network activity during cognitively demanding tasks; and anhedonia from hypoactivation of the cuneus and posterior insula during reward processing.

Indexed as

AffectExecutive FunctionAdolescentBrainCase-Control StudiesCaudate NucleusCerebral CortexChildChild, PreschoolFunctional NeuroimagingGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderOccipital LobeParahippocampal Gyrus

Identifiers

PMID26332700
PMCPMC11890701
OpenAlexW1696318955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.