SynthesisPloS one2015
Effectiveness of Mechanisms and Models of Coordination between Organizations, Agencies and Bodies Providing or Financing Health Services in Humanitarian Crises: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states: A review of systematic reviews.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Evolution of the humanitarian roster system for sexual and reproductive health.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Born too soon: accelerating change to 2030 and beyond.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Exploring the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards primary healthcare in northwest Syria.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Women and children first: Delivering solutions in conflict-affected settings.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Integrating mental health into primary health care in fragile and conflict-affected settings: a scoping review of mhGAP effectiveness.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Standardising job descriptions in the humanitarian supply chain: A text mining approach for recruitment process.PloS one · 2024Article
- Providing a model for financing the treatment costs during biological crises using the fiscal space development approach.Health economics review · 2023Article
- How can we strengthen partnership and coordination for health system emergency preparedness and response? Findings from a synthesis of experience across countries facing shocks.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Assessing barriers, opportunities and future directions in health information sharing in humanitarian contexts: a mixed-method study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Opinion: Academic-humanitarian technology partnerships: an unhappy marriage?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Refugee Mental Health, Global Health Policy, and the Syrian Crisis.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Primary Health Care Center (PHCC) Location-Allocation with Multi-Objective Modelling: A Case Study in Idleb, Syria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Emergency health evaluation of affected population during disasters: Are there new approaches?Journal of education and health promotion · 2019Review
- The governmental health policy-development process for Syrian refugees: an embedded qualitative case studies in Lebanon and Ontario.Conflict and health · 2019Article
- Towards an understanding of resilience: responding to health systems shocks.Health policy and planning · 2018Article
- The new informatics of pandemic response: humanitarian technology, efficiency, and the subtle retreat of national agency.Journal of international humanitarian action · 2018Article
- Mental health of refugees: global perspectives.BJPsych international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services in humanitarian crises is required to ensure efficiency of services, avoid duplication, and improve equity. The objective of this review was to assess how, during and after humanitarian crises, different mechanisms and models of coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services compare in terms of access to health services and health outcomes.
methodsWe registered a protocol for this review in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews under number PROSPERO2014:CRD42014009267. Eligible studies included randomized and nonrandomized designs, process evaluations and qualitative methods. We electronically searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the WHO Global Health Library and websites of relevant organizations. We followed standard systematic review methodology for the selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.
resultsOf 14,309 identified citations from databases and organizations' websites, we identified four eligible studies. Two studies used mixed-methods, one used quantitative methods, and one used qualitative methods. The available evidence suggests that information coordination between bodies providing health services in humanitarian crises settings may be effective in improving health systems inputs. There is additional evidence suggesting that management/directive coordination such as the cluster model may improve health system inputs in addition to access to health services. None of the included studies assessed coordination through common representation and framework coordination. The evidence was judged to be of very low quality.
conclusionThis systematic review provides evidence of possible effectiveness of information coordination and management/directive coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services in humanitarian crises. Our findings can inform the research agenda and highlight the need for improving conduct and reporting of research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.