Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26332670›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Effectiveness of Mechanisms and Models of Coordination between Organizations, Agencies and Bodies Providing or Financing Health Services in Humanitarian Crises: A Systematic Review.

Elie A Akl, Fadi El-Jardali, Lama Bou Karroum, Jamale El-Eid, Hneine Brax, Chaza Akik, Mona Osman, Ghayda Hassan, Mira Itani, Aida Farha and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Opinion: Academic-humanitarian technology partnerships: an unhappy marriage?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Elie A AklDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Fadi El-JardaliDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Research, Advocacy and Public Policy-making Program, Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lama Bou KarroumDepartment of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jamale El-EidVP of Medical Affairs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hneine BraxFaculty of Medicine, Université Saint Joseph, Beirut, Lebanon.
Chaza AkikDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Mona OsmanDepartment of Family Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghayda HassanDepartment of Psychology, University of Québec, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Mira ItaniFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Aida FarhaSaab Medical Library, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Kevin PottieDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sandy OliverDepartment of Childhood, Families and Health, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
American University of Beirut · LBMcMaster University · CALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSaint Joseph University · LBUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services in humanitarian crises is required to ensure efficiency of services, avoid duplication, and improve equity. The objective of this review was to assess how, during and after humanitarian crises, different mechanisms and models of coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services compare in terms of access to health services and health outcomes.

methodsWe registered a protocol for this review in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews under number PROSPERO2014:CRD42014009267. Eligible studies included randomized and nonrandomized designs, process evaluations and qualitative methods. We electronically searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the WHO Global Health Library and websites of relevant organizations. We followed standard systematic review methodology for the selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

resultsOf 14,309 identified citations from databases and organizations' websites, we identified four eligible studies. Two studies used mixed-methods, one used quantitative methods, and one used qualitative methods. The available evidence suggests that information coordination between bodies providing health services in humanitarian crises settings may be effective in improving health systems inputs. There is additional evidence suggesting that management/directive coordination such as the cluster model may improve health system inputs in addition to access to health services. None of the included studies assessed coordination through common representation and framework coordination. The evidence was judged to be of very low quality.

conclusionThis systematic review provides evidence of possible effectiveness of information coordination and management/directive coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services in humanitarian crises. Our findings can inform the research agenda and highlight the need for improving conduct and reporting of research in this field.

Indexed as

AltruismHealthcare FinancingHealth Services AdministrationHealth ServicesHumansRelief Work

Identifiers

PMID26332670
PMCPMC4558048
OpenAlexW1657666406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.