Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26332408›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

The Effect of Fixed Orthodontic Appliances and Fluoride Mouthwash on the Oral Microbiome of Adolescents - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Jessica E Koopman, Nicoline C W van der Kaaij, Mark J Buijs, Yassaman Elyassi, Monique H van der Veen, Wim Crielaard, Jacob M Ten Cate, Egija Zaura

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microbiome variability and role ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica E KoopmanDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicoline C W van der KaaijDepartment of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark J BuijsDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yassaman ElyassiDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique H van der VeenDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim CrielaardDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacob M Ten CateDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Egija ZauraDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the aesthetic effect of orthodontic treatment is clear, the knowledge on how it influences the oral microbiota and the consequential effects on oral health are limited. In this randomized controlled clinical trial we investigated the changes introduced in the oral ecosystem, during and after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in combination with or without a fluoride mouthwash, of 10-16.8 year old individuals (N = 91). We followed several clinical parameters in time, in combination with microbiome changes using next-generation sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. During the course of our study, the oral microbial community displayed remarkable resilience towards the disturbances it was presented with. The effects of the fluoride mouthwash on the microbial composition were trivial. More pronounced microbial changes were related to gingival health status, orthodontic treatment and time. Periodontal pathogens (e.g. Selenomonas and Porphyromonas) were highest in abundance during the orthodontic treatment, while the health associated Streptococcus, Rothia and Haemophilus gained abundance towards the end and after the orthodontic treatment. Only minor compositional changes remained in the oral microbiome after the end of treatment. We conclude that, provided proper oral hygiene is maintained, changes in the oral microbiome composition resulting from orthodontic treatment are minimal and do not negatively affect oral health.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMouthwashesOrthodontic AppliancesAdolescentChildFluoridesGingivaHumansMouthPlacebosFluoridesMouthwashesPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID26332408
PMCPMC4558009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.