Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26331869›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2015

Cardiovascular-renal axis disorders in the domestic dog and cat: a veterinary consensus statement.

J L Pouchelon, C E Atkins, C Bussadori, M A Oyama, S L Vaden, J D Bonagura, V Chetboul, L D Cowgill, J Elliot, T Francey and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feline comorbidities: cardiovascular and kidney diseases.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evidence for chronic inflammation in cats with cardiomyopathies.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

J L PouchelonUniversité Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Unité de Cardiologie d'Alfort, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vétérinaire d'Alfort (CHUVA), Maisons-Alfort 94704, France.
C E AtkinsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.
C BussadoriClinica Veterinaria Gran Sasso, Milano 20131, Italy.
M A OyamaDepartment of Clinical Studies-Philadelphia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
S L VadenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.
J D BonaguraDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
V ChetboulUniversité Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Unité de Cardiologie d'Alfort, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vétérinaire d'Alfort (CHUVA), Maisons-Alfort 94704, France.
L D CowgillDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
J ElliotComparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU.
T FranceyDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
G F GrauerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
V Luis FuentesDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
N Sydney MoiseDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
D J PolzinDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
A M Van DongenDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, University of Utrecht College of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht 3584, The Netherlands.
N Van IsraëlACAPULCO Animal Cardiopulmonary Consultancy, Masta, Stavelot 4970, Belgium.
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRNorth Carolina State University · USCardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute · USCornell University · USKansas State University · USRoyal Veterinary College · GBThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUtrecht University · NLVeterinary Oncological Center · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is a growing understanding of the complexity of interplay between renal and cardiovascular systems in both health and disease. The medical profession has adopted the term "cardiorenal syndrome" (CRS) to describe the pathophysiological relationship between the kidney and heart in disease. CRS has yet to be formally defined and described by the veterinary profession and its existence and importance in dogs and cats warrant investigation. The CRS Consensus Group, comprising nine veterinary cardiologists and seven nephrologists from Europe and North America, sought to achieve consensus around the definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of dogs and cats with "cardiovascular-renal disorders" (CvRD). To this end, the Delphi formal methodology for defining/building consensus and defining guidelines was utilised.

methodsFollowing a literature review, 13 candidate statements regarding CvRD in dogs and cats were tested for consensus, using a modified Delphi method. As a new area of interest, well-designed studies, specific to CRS/CvRD, are lacking, particularly in dogs and cats. Hence, while scientific justification of all the recommendations was sought and used when available, recommendations were largely reliant on theory, expert opinion, small clinical studies and extrapolation from data derived from other species.

resultsOf the 13 statements, 11 achieved consensus and 2 did not. The modified Delphi approach worked well to achieve consensus in an objective manner and to develop initial guidelines for CvRD. DISCUSSION: The resultant manuscript describes consensus statements for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management strategies for veterinary patients with CvRD, with an emphasis on the pathological interplay between the two organ systems. By formulating consensus statements regarding CvRD in veterinary medicine, the authors hope to stimulate interest in and advancement of the understanding and management of CvRD in dogs and cats. The use of a formalised method for consensus and guideline development should be considered for other topics in veterinary medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardio-Renal SyndromeCat DiseasesCatsConsensusDelphi TechniqueDog DiseasesDogsPractice Guidelines as TopicVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID26331869
PMCPMC4584495
OpenAlexW2168043276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.