Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26331851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Intensive DNA Replication and Metabolism during the Lag Phase in Cyanobacteria.

Satoru Watanabe, Ryudo Ohbayashi, Yu Kanesaki, Natsumi Saito, Taku Chibazakura, Tomoyoshi Soga, Hirofumi Yoshikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ploidy levels in diverse picocyanobacteria from the Baltic Sea.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Ploidy inGenes · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satoru WatanabeDepartment of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryudo OhbayashiDepartment of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama, 332-0012, Japan.
Yu KanesakiGenome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Natsumi SaitoInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan.
Taku ChibazakuraDepartment of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyoshi SogaInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan.
Hirofumi YoshikawaDepartment of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama, 332-0012, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, several species of freshwater cyanobacteria are known to contain multiple chromosomal copies per cell, at all stages of their cell cycle. We have characterized the replication of multi-copy chromosomes in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 (hereafter Synechococcus 7942). In Synechococcus 7942, the replication of multi-copy chromosome is asynchronous, not only among cells but also among multi-copy chromosomes. This suggests that DNA replication is not tightly coupled to cell division in Synechococcus 7942. To address this hypothesis, we analysed the relationship between DNA replication and cell doubling at various growth phases of Synechococcus 7942 cell culture. Three distinct growth phases were characterised in Synechococcus 7942 batch culture: lag phase, exponential phase, and arithmetic (linear) phase. The chromosomal copy number was significantly higher during the lag phase than during the exponential and linear phases. Likewise, DNA replication activity was higher in the lag phase cells than in the exponential and linear phase cells, and the lag phase cells were more sensitive to nalidixic acid, a DNA gyrase inhibitor, than cells in other growth phases. To elucidate physiological differences in Synechococcus 7942 during the lag phase, we analysed the metabolome at each growth phase. In addition, we assessed the accumulation of central carbon metabolites, amino acids, and DNA precursors at each phase. The results of these analyses suggest that Synechococcus 7942 cells prepare for cell division during the lag phase by initiating intensive chromosomal DNA replication and accumulating metabolites necessary for the subsequent cell division and elongation steps that occur during the exponential growth and linear phases.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialMetabolomeSynechococcusDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26331851
PMCPMC4558043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.