Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26331408›Full record

ArticleKidney international2015

Development of a risk stratification algorithm to improve patient-centered care and decision making for incident elderly patients with end-stage renal disease.

Cécile G Couchoud, Jean-Baptiste R Beuscart, Jean-Claude Aldigier, Philippe J Brunet, Olivier P Moranne, REIN registry

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Relevance of Geriatric Impairments in Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Dialysis in the Elderly: A Practical Guide for the Clinician.International journal of nephrology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cécile G CouchoudREIN Registry, Agence de la biomédecine, Saint-Denis la Plaine, France.
Jean-Baptiste R BeuscartDepartment of Biostatistics, EA2694, Lille School of Medicine, Lille2 University, Lille, France.
Jean-Claude AldigierNephrology Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Philippe J BrunetNephrology Unit, APHM University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Olivier P MoranneNephrology Unit, Caremeau University Hospital, Nimes, France.
REIN registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant number of elderly patients die during their first 3 months of dialysis. Because dialysis can impair the quality of both life and death, a personalized care plan based on both early prognosis and patient choices is required. We developed a prognostic screening tool to identify older patients in need of specific care based on a multidisciplinary approach. Our study included 24,348 patients aged 75 years and older from the French national renal epidemiology and information network (REIN) registry who began dialysis between 1 January 2005 and 30 September 2012. Our primary outcome was overall mortality during the first 3 months of renal replacement therapy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to construct a scoring system in a random half of the cohort (training set). This score, which included age, gender, specific comorbidities, albumin levels, and mobility, was then applied to the other half (validation set). In all, 2548 patients died during the first 3 months after dialysis initiation, 22% after dialysis withdrawal. Three risk groups were identified: low risk (score under 12 points, 3-month expected mortality under 20%), intermediate risk (score from 12 to 16, mortality between 20 and 40%, 9.5% of patients) and high risk (score 17 or more, mortality over 40%, 2.5% of patients). We developed a decision-making process that classifies patients according to their risk of early death in view of their potentially imminent need for supportive care or treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRenal Replacement TherapyAgedDecision MakingFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePrognosisRegistriesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26331408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.