Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26331056›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials research2014

Nanofibrous scaffolds in biomedical applications.

Kailash Chandra Gupta, Adnan Haider, Yu-Ri Choi, Inn-Kyu Kang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biomaterials strategy for promoting palatal wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kailash Chandra GuptaDepartment of Polymer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701 South Korea ; Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 247 667 India.
Adnan HaiderDepartment of Polymer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701 South Korea.
Yu-Ri ChoiDepartment of Polymer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701 South Korea.
Inn-Kyu KangDepartment of Polymer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701 South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanofibrous scaffolds are artificial extracellular matrices which provide natural environment for tissue formation. In comparison to other forms of scaffolds, the nanofibrous scaffolds promote cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation more efficiently due to having high surface to volume ratio. Although scaffolds for tissue engineering have been fabricated by various techniques but electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds have shown great potential in the fields of tissue engineering and regeneration. This review highlights the applications and importance of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds in various fields of biomedical applications ranging from drug delivery to wound healing. Attempts have also been made to highlights the advantages and disadvantages of nanofirbous scaffolds fabricated for biomedical applications using technique of electrospinning. The role of various factors controlling drug distribution in electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds is also discussed to increase the therapeutic efficiency of nanofibrous scaffolds in wound healing and drug delivery applications.

Indexed as

Bioactive agentDrug deliveryElectrospinningTissue engineeringWound healing

Identifiers

PMID26331056
PMCPMC4549138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.