ArticleCerebellum & ataxias2014
Effects of somatosensory stimulation on corticomotor excitability in patients with unilateral cerebellar infarcts and healthy subjects - preliminary results.
Article in Cerebellum & ataxias, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of prism adaptation combined with electrical stimulation on cortical excitability of upper and lower limb muscles.Behavioural brain research · 2026Trial
- Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2019Trial
- Timing- and frequency-specific effects of dentate nucleus deep brain stimulation on somatosensory-evoked potentials in people with poststroke hemiparesis.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Advances in biotechnology and clinical therapy in the field of peripheral nerve regeneration based on magnetism.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Modulation of the Corticomotor Excitability by Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on the Median Nerve in Healthy Subjects.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Functional Connectivity Evoked by Orofacial Tactile Perception of Velocity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Erratum to: Effects of somatosensory stimulation on corticomotor excitability in patients with unilateral cerebellar infarcts and healthy subjects - preliminary results.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2016Article
- The in vivo reduction of afferent facilitation induced by low frequency electrical stimulation of the motor cortex is antagonized by cathodal direct current stimulation of the cerebellum.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn healthy humans, somatosensory stimulation in the form of 2 h-repetitive peripheral afferent nerve stimulation (SS) increases excitability of the contralateral motor cortex. In this preliminary study, we explored effects of SS on excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with unilateral cerebellar infarcts and age-matched controls.
methodsTen patients with infarcts in one cerebellar hemisphere and six age-matched controls participated in the study. Each subject participated in one session of active, and one session of sham SS delivered to the median nerve ipsilateral to the cerebellar infarct in patients, and to the homologous nerve in controls. Before and after each session, the following TMS measures were performed: resting motor threshold (rMT), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF). Amplitudes of motor evoked potentials were normalized to amplitudes of supramaximal M responses (MEP/M ratios).
resultsIn the control group, there was a significant increase in rMT, and a significant increase in MEP/M ratios after active, but not after sham SS. There were no significant differences in rMT or MEP/M ratios in the group of patients after active or sham SS. There were no significant differences in SICI or SICF after active or sham SS in either group.
conclusionConsistent with results reported in rodents, these preliminary findings suggest for the first time in humans, that normal cerebellar activity is required so that SS can modulate excitability of the sensorimotor cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.